Fragment- and structure-based drug discovery for developing therapeutic agents targeting the DNA Damage Response

dc.contributor.authorWilson, David M., III.
dc.contributor.authorDeacon, Ashley M.
dc.contributor.authorDuncton, Matthew A. J.
dc.contributor.authorPellicena, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiadis, Millie M.
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Andrew P.
dc.contributor.authorArvai, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorMoiani, Davide
dc.contributor.authorTainer, John A.
dc.contributor.authorDas, Debanu
dc.contributor.departmentBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T14:21:29Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T14:21:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.description.abstractCancer will directly affect the lives of over one-third of the population. The DNA Damage Response (DDR) is an intricate system involving damage recognition, cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and ultimately cell fate determination, playing a central role in cancer etiology and therapy. Two primary therapeutic approaches involving DDR targeting include: combinatorial treatments employing anticancer genotoxic agents; and synthetic lethality, exploiting a sporadic DDR defect as a mechanism for cancer-specific therapy. Whereas, many DDR proteins have proven “undruggable”, Fragment- and Structure-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD, SBDD) have advanced therapeutic agent identification and development. FBDD has led to 4 (with ∼50 more drugs under preclinical and clinical development), while SBDD is estimated to have contributed to the development of >200, FDA-approved medicines. Protein X-ray crystallography-based fragment library screening, especially for elusive or “undruggable” targets, allows for simultaneous generation of hits plus details of protein-ligand interactions and binding sites (orthosteric or allosteric) that inform chemical tractability, downstream biology, and intellectual property. Using a novel high-throughput crystallography-based fragment library screening platform, we screened five diverse proteins, yielding hit rates of ∼2–8% and crystal structures from ∼1.8 to 3.2 Å. We consider current FBDD/SBDD methods and some exemplary results of efforts to design inhibitors against the DDR nucleases meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11, a.k.a., MRE11A), apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1, a.k.a., APEX1), and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1).en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationWilson, D. M., Deacon, A. M., Duncton, M. A. J., Pellicena, P., Georgiadis, M. M., Yeh, A. P., Arvai, A. S., Moiani, D., Tainer, J. A., & Das, D. (2021). Fragment- and structure-based drug discovery for developing therapeutic agents targeting the DNA Damage Response. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 163, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.10.005en_US
dc.identifier.issn0079-6107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/28450
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.10.005en_US
dc.relation.journalProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectCancer therapeuticsen_US
dc.subjectDNA damage Responseen_US
dc.subjectDNA repairen_US
dc.subjectFEN1en_US
dc.subjectFragment-based drug discoveryen_US
dc.titleFragment- and structure-based drug discovery for developing therapeutic agents targeting the DNA Damage Responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wilson2021Fragment-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
1.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: