Trying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Melissa A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brett , Emma I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chavarria, Jesus | |
dc.contributor.author | King, Andrea C. | |
dc.contributor.department | Psychology, School of Science | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-08T20:23:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-08T20:23:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: While nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is a frontline tobacco treatment that doubles smoking quit rates, only about 18% of Black adults who smoke cigarettes report lifetime use of NRT. A promising approach for increasing NRT use is in-session (in-vivo) NRT sampling within cessation interventions. The present pilot study examined the effectiveness of an in-vivo NRT sampling intervention within a single-session, culturally-targeted motivational intervention trial in Black adults who smoke cigarettes. Methods: Non-treatment-seeking disadvantaged Black adults (N = 60) were offered the choice to sample nicotine lozenge, patch, or both in-session with the counselor present. Regardless of their choice, they were offered a one-week starter kit of both products. Data were analyzed at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were 1) differences in motivation to quit smoking among NRT samplers versus non-samplers, 2) in-vivo NRT sampling preferences, and 3) in-vivo sampling's association with NRT use and improved smoking outcomes at follow up. Results: Almost all participants accepted a take-home NRT starter kit, and approximately half of those offered in-vivo sampling agreed to sample. Participants preferred sampling lozenges in session (75.8% lozenge only vs. 12.1% nicotine patch only or 12.1% both; p < .001). Motivation to quit smoking was not related to likelihood of in-vivo NRT sampling (p > .05). At 1-month follow-up, in-vivo samplers were more likely to use NRT (94% vs. 35%, respectively; p < .001) and report a quit attempt (81.8% vs. 53.9%, p < .05) compared to non-samplers. Conclusion: In-vivo NRT sampling is a promising strategy to improve NRT uptake among Black adults who smoke cigarettes, regardless of motivation to quit smoking. | |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | |
dc.identifier.citation | Liu, M. A., Brett, E. I., Chavarria, J., & King, A. C. (2022). Trying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 241, 109679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109679 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/40563 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109679 | |
dc.relation.journal | Drug and Alcohol Dependence | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | Author | |
dc.subject | Black/African American | |
dc.subject | In-vivo sampling | |
dc.subject | Nicotine replacement therapy. | |
dc.title | Trying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes | |
dc.type | Article |