Trying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Melissa A.
dc.contributor.authorBrett , Emma I.
dc.contributor.authorChavarria, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorKing, Andrea C.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology, School of Science
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T20:23:33Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T20:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: While nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is a frontline tobacco treatment that doubles smoking quit rates, only about 18% of Black adults who smoke cigarettes report lifetime use of NRT. A promising approach for increasing NRT use is in-session (in-vivo) NRT sampling within cessation interventions. The present pilot study examined the effectiveness of an in-vivo NRT sampling intervention within a single-session, culturally-targeted motivational intervention trial in Black adults who smoke cigarettes. Methods: Non-treatment-seeking disadvantaged Black adults (N = 60) were offered the choice to sample nicotine lozenge, patch, or both in-session with the counselor present. Regardless of their choice, they were offered a one-week starter kit of both products. Data were analyzed at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were 1) differences in motivation to quit smoking among NRT samplers versus non-samplers, 2) in-vivo NRT sampling preferences, and 3) in-vivo sampling's association with NRT use and improved smoking outcomes at follow up. Results: Almost all participants accepted a take-home NRT starter kit, and approximately half of those offered in-vivo sampling agreed to sample. Participants preferred sampling lozenges in session (75.8% lozenge only vs. 12.1% nicotine patch only or 12.1% both; p < .001). Motivation to quit smoking was not related to likelihood of in-vivo NRT sampling (p > .05). At 1-month follow-up, in-vivo samplers were more likely to use NRT (94% vs. 35%, respectively; p < .001) and report a quit attempt (81.8% vs. 53.9%, p < .05) compared to non-samplers. Conclusion: In-vivo NRT sampling is a promising strategy to improve NRT uptake among Black adults who smoke cigarettes, regardless of motivation to quit smoking.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationLiu, M. A., Brett, E. I., Chavarria, J., & King, A. C. (2022). Trying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 241, 109679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109679
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40563
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109679
dc.relation.journalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourceAuthor
dc.subjectBlack/African American
dc.subjectIn-vivo sampling
dc.subjectNicotine replacement therapy.
dc.titleTrying is believing: A pilot study of in-vivo nicotine replacement therapy sampling in disadvantaged Black adults who smoke cigarettes
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Liu2022Trying-AAM.pdf
Size:
353.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: