Reconstructive options following orbital exenteration

Date
2020-10
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wolters Kluwer
Abstract

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to examine current trends in reconstruction following orbital exenteration. Defects ranging from isolated exenteration to more complex midface resections are explored.

Recent findings Goals of reconstruction include separating the sino-orbital cavities and creating a safe, stable wound that can withstand adjuvant radiation. When planning for orbital rehabilitation, it is important to create a concave cavity that can accommodate a prosthesis. This is primarily achieved through secondary granulation or split-thickness skin grafts. Recently, the use of dermal allografts has been investigated and shown good success with epithelization of the orbital cavity. For complex orbitomaxillectomy defects, musculocutaneous free tissue flaps remain the mainstay for reconstruction.

Summary Reconstructive options following orbital exenteration are based on extent of the defect, need for postoperative radiation, and plans for orbital rehabilitation with prosthesis.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Yesensky, J., & Lebo, N. (2020). Reconstructive options following orbital exenteration. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 28(5), 352–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000662
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
Rights
Publisher Policy
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}