Carious lesion remineralizing potential of fluoride- and calcium-containing toothpastes

dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.authorGill, Karmjeet K.
dc.contributor.departmentCariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T20:13:13Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T20:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.description.abstractBackground The authors conducted a laboratory study to determine the carious lesion remineralization and fluoridation potential of fluoride (F)- and calcium-containing toothpastes. Methods The authors created early carious lesions in bovine enamel specimens and assigned them to 7 treatment groups on the basis of their surface Vickers microhardness: Clinpro Tooth Crème (Clinpro) (3M ESPE), CTx4 Gel 1100 (CTx4) (Oral Biotech), Enamelon Fluoride Toothpaste (Enamelon) (Premier Dental), MI Paste ONE (MI-One) (GC America), Crest Cavity Protection Toothpaste (Crest) (Procter & Gamble), and 2 F-dose controls (low F, high F). The authors pH cycled the specimens for 10 days by using an established model, determined changes in surface microhardness, calculated percentage of surface microhardness recovery (%SMHr; primary outcome variable), and measured enamel F uptake (EFU). The authors used a 1-way analysis of variance for data analysis. Results Study results showed an F-dose response for both %SMHr (low-F control: mean, 9.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7 to 13.8); Crest: mean, 26.2; CI, 21.8 to 30.6; high-F control: mean, 33.5; CI, 29.4 to 37.5) and EFU (low-F control: mean, 47; CI, 12 to 83; Crest: mean, 225; CI, 189 to 260; high-F control: mean, 307; CI, 271 to 342; all micrograms of F per cubic centimeter). For %SMHr, Clinpro (mean, 26.5; CI, 22.5 to 30.6) and CTx4 (mean, 27.3; CI, 23.1 to 31.5) were similar to Crest, all being superior to Enamelon (mean, 15.6; CI, 11.6 to 19.7), which was superior to MI-One (mean, 4.3; CI, 0.3 to 8.3). For EFU, there were no differences between Clinpro (mean, 189; CI, 153 to 224), CTx4 (mean, 177; CI, 142 to 213), Enamelon (mean, 196; CI, 161 to 232), and Crest, all being superior to MI-One (mean, 66; CI, 30 to 102). Conclusions This study’s results failed to show superior remineralizing efficacy of any of the toothpastes compared with those of a calcium-free F toothpaste, with 2 of the 4 toothpastes being inferior. Clinical testing will be required to establish conclusive evidence.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationLippert, F., & Gill, K. K. (2019). Carious lesion remineralizing potential of fluoride- and calcium-containing toothpastes: A laboratory study. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 150(5), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.11.022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24151
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.adaj.2018.11.022en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of the American Dental Associationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectcarious lesionen_US
dc.subjectremineralizationen_US
dc.subjectfluorideen_US
dc.titleCarious lesion remineralizing potential of fluoride- and calcium-containing toothpastesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lippert_2019_laboratory.pdf
Size:
701.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: