In Search of Medical Professionalism Research: Preliminary Results from a Review of Widely Read Medical Journals

dc.contributor.authorIsaacson, J. Harry
dc.contributor.authorZiring, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorHafferty, Fred
dc.contributor.authorKalet, Adina
dc.contributor.authorLittleton, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorFrankel, Richard M.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-15T13:47:17Z
dc.date.available2023-05-15T13:47:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Professionalism is a core concept in medicine. The extent to which knowledge about professionalism is anchored in empirical research is unknown. Understanding the current state of research is necessary to identify significant gaps and create a road map for future professionalism efforts. The authors conducted an exploratory literature review to characterize professionalism research published in widely read medical journals, identify knowledge gaps, and describe the sources of funding for the identified studies. Methods: The authors focused on Medline's Abridged Index Medicus and 4 core Medline education-oriented journal and developed a search filter using text words found in the article title or abstract addressing professionalism. Articles were further filtered to include those indicating a research focus. Results: The search strategy resulted in 461 professionalism research articles for analysis. Articles were divided into themes of education (n = 212, 45.9%), performance (n = 83, 18%), measurement development (n = 13, 2.8%), remediation (n = 53, 11.5%), and well-being (n = 100, 21.6%). There were 36 studies from 1980 to 2002 (Era 1: before publication of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies) and 425 from 2003 to 17 (Era 2: after Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education publication of competencies). Professionalism education was the most common topic area, and most studies were from single institutions with results based on convenience samples. Most studies received no funding or were funded by the authors' own institution. Discussion: Little empirical research is available on professionalism in widely read medical journals. There has been limited external research funding available to study this topic. Conclusion: More investment in high quality professionalism research is justified and should be encouraged.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationIsaacson JH, Ziring D, Hafferty F, Kalet A, Littleton D, Frankel RM. In Search of Medical Professionalism Research: Preliminary Results from a Review of Widely Read Medical Journals. Perm J. 2021;25:20.223. Published 2021 May 26. doi:10.7812/TPP/20.223en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32966
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKaiser Permanenteen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7812/TPP/20.223en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Permanente Journalen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectMedical educationen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalismen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.titleIn Search of Medical Professionalism Research: Preliminary Results from a Review of Widely Read Medical Journalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
tpj20223.pdf
Size:
573.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: