Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a case report

dc.contributor.authorGhoneima, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorAlBarakati, Sahar
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Feifei
dc.contributor.authorKula, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorWasfy, Tamer
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, IU School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-13T18:24:42Z
dc.date.available2016-06-13T18:24:42Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-24
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Assessment of the upper airway volume, morphology, and mechanics is of great importance for the orthodontic patient. We hypothesize that upper airway dimensions have significant effects on the dynamics of the airway flow and that both the dimensions and mechanics of the upper airway are greatly affected by orthodontic and orthopedic procedures such as rapid maxillary expansion (RME). The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of RME on the airway flow rate and pattern by comparing the fluid dynamics results of pre- and post-treatment finite element models. METHODS: Customized pre- and post-treatment computational fluid dynamics models of the patient's upper airway were built for comparison based on three-dimensional computed tomogram. The inhalation process was simulated using a constant volume flow rate for both models, and the wall was set to be rigid and stationary. Laminar and turbulent analyses were applied. RESULTS: Comparisons between before and after RME airway volume measurements showed that increases were only detected in nasal cavity volume, nasopharynx volume, and the most constricted area of the airway. Pressure, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy decreased after dental expansion for laminar and turbulent flow. Turbulent flow shows relatively larger velocity and pressure than laminar flow. CONCLUSIONS: RME showed positive effects that may help understand the key reasons behind relieving the symptom of breathing disorders in this patient. Turbulence occurs at both nasal and oropharynx areas, and it showed relatively larger pressure and velocity compared to laminar flow.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGhoneima, A., AlBarakati, S., Jiang, F., Kula, K., & Wasfy, T. (2015). Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a case report. Progress in Orthodontics, 16, 10. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0085-xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/9925
dc.publisherSpringerOpenen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s40510-015-0085-xen_US
dc.relation.journalProgress in Orthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectPalatal expansion techniqueen_US
dc.subjectAirway resistanceen_US
dc.titleComputational fluid dynamics analysis of the upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a case reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
40510_2015_Article_85.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: