Assessing the Transition of Training in Health Systems Science From Undergraduate to Graduate Medical Education

dc.contributor.authorSanten, Sally A.
dc.contributor.authorHamstra, Stanley J.
dc.contributor.authorYamazaki, Kenji
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo, Jed
dc.contributor.authorLomis, Kim
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Bradley
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Luan
dc.contributor.authorHolmboe, Eric S.
dc.contributor.authorTriola, Marc
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Paul
dc.contributor.authorGorman, Paul N.
dc.contributor.authorSkochelak, Susan
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T11:49:21Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T11:49:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: The American Medical Association Accelerating Change in Medical Education (AMA-ACE) consortium proposes that medical schools include a new 3-pillar model incorporating health systems science (HSS) and basic and clinical sciences. One of the goals of AMA-ACE was to support HSS curricular innovation to improve residency preparation. Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of HSS curricula by using a large dataset to link medical school graduates to internship Milestones through collaboration with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Methods: ACGME subcompetencies related to the schools' HSS curricula were identified for internal medicine, emergency medicine, family medicine, obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), pediatrics, and surgery. Analysis compared Milestone ratings of ACE school graduates to non-ACE graduates at 6 and 12 months using generalized estimating equation models. Results: At 6 months both groups demonstrated similar HSS-related levels of Milestone performance on the selected ACGME competencies. At 1 year, ACE graduates in OB/GYN scored minimally higher on 2 systems-based practice (SBP) subcompetencies compared to non-ACE school graduates: SBP01 (1.96 vs 1.82, 95% CI 0.03-0.24) and SBP02 (1.87 vs 1.79, 95% CI 0.01-0.16). In internal medicine, ACE graduates scored minimally higher on 3 HSS-related subcompetencies: SBP01 (2.19 vs 2.05, 95% CI 0.04-0.26), PBLI01 (2.13 vs 2.01; 95% CI 0.01-0.24), and PBLI04 (2.05 vs 1.93; 95% CI 0.03-0.21). For the other specialties examined, there were no significant differences between groups. Conclusions: Graduates from schools with training in HSS had similar Milestone ratings for most subcompetencies and very small differences in Milestone ratings for only 5 subcompetencies across 6 specialties at 1 year, compared to graduates from non-ACE schools. These differences are likely not educationally meaningful.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationSanten SA, Hamstra SJ, Yamazaki K, et al. Assessing the Transition of Training in Health Systems Science From Undergraduate to Graduate Medical Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(3):404-410. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-01268.1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/34395
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educationen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4300/JGME-D-20-01268.1en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Graduate Medical Educationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAccreditationen_US
dc.subjectClinical competenceen_US
dc.subjectGraduate medical educationen_US
dc.subjectEducational measurementen_US
dc.titleAssessing the Transition of Training in Health Systems Science From Undergraduate to Graduate Medical Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207938/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
i1949-8357-13-3-404.pdf
Size:
205.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: