Genetic and environment effects on structural neuroimaging endophenotype for bipolar disorder: a novel molecular approach

dc.contributor.authorHu, Bo
dc.contributor.authorCha, Jungwon
dc.contributor.authorFullerton, Janice M.
dc.contributor.authorHesam-Shariati, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Kunio
dc.contributor.authorNurnberger, John I.
dc.contributor.authorAnand, Amit
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T11:55:29Z
dc.date.available2023-06-12T11:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-04
dc.description.abstractWe investigated gene-environment effects on structural brain endophenotype in bipolar disorder (BD) using a novel method of combining polygenic risk scores with epigenetic signatures since traditional methods of examining the family history and trauma effects have significant limitations. The study enrolled 119 subjects, including 55 BD spectrum (BDS) subjects diagnosed with BD or major depressive disorder (MDD) with subthreshold BD symptoms and 64 non-BDS subjects comprising 32 MDD subjects without BD symptoms and 32 healthy subjects. The blood samples underwent genome-wide genotyping and methylation quantification. We derived polygenic risk score (PRS) and methylation profile score (MPS) as weighted summations of risk single nucleotide polymorphisms and methylation probes, respectively, which were considered as molecular measures of genetic and environmental risks for BD. Linear regression was used to relate PRS, MPS, and their interaction to 44 brain structure measures quantified from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 47 BDS subjects, and the results were compared with those based on family history and childhood trauma. After multiplicity corrections using false discovery rate (FDR), MPS was found to be negatively associated with the volume of the medial geniculate thalamus (FDR = 0.059, partial R2 = 0.208). Family history, trauma scale, and PRS were not associated with any brain measures. PRS and MPS show significant interactions on whole putamen (FDR = 0.09, partial R2 = 0.337). No significant gene-environment interactions were identified for the family history and trauma scale. PRS and MPS generally explained greater proportions of variances of the brain measures (range of partial R2 = [0.008, 0.337]) than the clinical risk factors (range = [0.004, 0.228]).en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationHu B, Cha J, Fullerton JM, et al. Genetic and environment effects on structural neuroimaging endophenotype for bipolar disorder: a novel molecular approach. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):137. Published 2022 Apr 4. doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01892-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33652
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41398-022-01892-3en_US
dc.relation.journalTranslational Psychiatryen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectBipolar disorderen_US
dc.subjectGeneticsen_US
dc.subjectMajor depressive disorderen_US
dc.subjectEndophenotypesen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimagingen_US
dc.titleGenetic and environment effects on structural neuroimaging endophenotype for bipolar disorder: a novel molecular approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files