Tele-Neuro-Ophthalmology Utilization, Availability, and Attitudes: Update 1 Year Into the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

dc.contributor.authorMoss, Heather E.
dc.contributor.authorLai, Kevin E.
dc.contributor.authorKo, Melissa W.
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-25T13:32:50Z
dc.date.available2023-10-25T13:32:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: Telehealth was rapidly adopted early in the COVID-19 pandemic as a way to provide medical care while reducing risk of SARS-CoV2 transmission. Since then, telehealth utilization has evolved differentially according to subspecialty. This study assessed changes in neuro-ophthalmology during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Telehealth utilization and opinions pre-COVID-19, early pandemic (spring 2020), and 1 year later (spring 2021) were surveyed among practicing neuro-ophthalmologists in and outside the United States using an online platform. Demographics, self-reported utilization, perceived benefits, barriers, and examination suitability were collected over a 2-week period in May 2021. Results: A total of 135 practicing neuro-ophthalmologists (81.5% United States, 47.4% females, median age 45-54 years) completed the survey. The proportion of participants using video visits remained elevated during COVID + 1 year (50.8%) compared with pre-COVID (6%, P < 0.0005, McNemar), although decreased compared with early COVID (67%, P < 0.0005). Video visits were the most commonly used methodology. The proportion of participants using remote testing (42.2% vs 46.2%), virtual second opinions (14.5% vs 11.9%, P = 0.45), and eConsults (13.5% vs 16.2%, P = 0.38) remained similar between early and COVID + 1 year ( P = 0.25). The majority selected increased access to care, better continuity of care, and enhanced patient appointment efficiency as benefits, whereas reimbursement, liability, disruption of in-person clinic flow, limitations of video examinations, and patient technology use were barriers. Many participants deemed many neuro-ophthalmic examination elements unsuitable when collected during a live video session, although participants believed some examination components could be evaluated adequately through a review of ancillary testing or outside records. Conclusions: One year into the COVID-19 pandemic, neuro-ophthalmologists maintained telemedicine utilization at rates higher than prepandemic levels. Tele-neuro-ophthalmology remains a valuable tool in augmenting patient care.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationMoss HE, Lai KE, Ko MW. Tele-Neuro-Ophthalmology Utilization, Availability, and Attitudes: Update 1 Year Into the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. J Neuroophthalmol. 2023;43(1):40-47. doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000001663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/36650
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/WNO.0000000000001663
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.subjectPandemics
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectViral RNA
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.titleTele-Neuro-Ophthalmology Utilization, Availability, and Attitudes: Update 1 Year Into the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924738/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
jno-43-40.pdf
Size:
474.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: