Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care
dc.contributor.author | Aalsma, Matthew C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zerr, Ashley M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Etter, Dillon J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ouyang, Fangqian | |
dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, Amy Lewis | |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Rebekah L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hall, James A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Downs, Stephen M. | |
dc.contributor.department | Pediatrics, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T15:10:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T15:10:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-based screening and physician feedback to guide adolescent depression management within primary care. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study within two clinics of the computer-based depression screening and physician feedback algorithm among youth aged 12–20 years between October 2014 and October 2015 in Marion County (Indianapolis), Indiana. Results Our sample included 2,038 youth (51% female; 60% black; mean age = 14.6 years [standard deviation = 2.1]). Over 20% of youth screened positive for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and 303 youth (14.8%) screened positive on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The most common follow-up action by physicians was a referral to mental health services (34.2% mild, 46.8% moderate, and 72.2% severe range). Almost 11% of youth in the moderate range and 22.7% of youth in the severe range were already prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. When predicting mental health service referral, significant predictors in the multivariate analysis included clinic site (40.2% vs. 73.9%; p < .0001) and PHQ-9 score (severe range 77.8% vs. mild range 47.5%; p < .01). Similarly, when predicting initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, only clinic site (28.6% vs. 6.9%; p < .01) and PHQ-9 score (severe range 46.7% vs. moderate range 10.6%; p < .001) were significant. Conclusions When a computer-based decision support system algorithm focused on adolescent depression was implemented in two primary care clinics, a majority of physicians utilized screening results to guide clinical care. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Aalsma, M. C., Zerr, A. M., Etter, D. J., Ouyang, F., Gilbert, A. L., Williams, R. L., … Downs, S. M. (2018). Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/16606 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.023 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Adolescent Health | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | depression | en_US |
dc.subject | primary care | en_US |
dc.subject | screening | en_US |
dc.title | Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |