A national study of clinical discussions about cannabis use among Veteran patients prescribed opioids
dc.contributor.author | Zaman, Tauheed | |
dc.contributor.author | Bravata, Dawn M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Byers, Amy | |
dc.contributor.author | Krebs, Erin | |
dc.contributor.author | Leonard, Samuel | |
dc.contributor.author | Austin, Charles | |
dc.contributor.author | Sandbrink, Friedhelm | |
dc.contributor.author | Hasin, Deborah S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Keyhani, Salomeh | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-26T12:49:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-26T12:49:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The Veterans Health Administration tracks urine drug tests (UDTs) among patients on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) and recommends discussing the health effects of cannabis use. Objective: To determine the occurrence of cannabis-related discussions between providers and patients on LTOT during six months following UDT positive for cannabis, and examine factors associated with documenting cannabis use. Design: We identified patients prescribed LTOT with a UDT positive for cannabis in 2019. We developed a text-processing tool to extract discussions around cannabis use from their charts. Subjects: Twelve thousand seventy patients were included. Chart review was conducted on a random sample of 1,946 patients. Main measures: The presence of a cannabis term in the chart suggesting documented cannabis use or cannabis-related discussions. Content of those discussions was extracted in a subset of patients. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between patient factors, including state of residence legal status, with documentation of cannabis use. Key results: Among the 12,070 patients, 65.8% (N = 7,948) had a cannabis term, whereas 34.1% (N = 4,122) of patients lacked a cannabis term, suggesting that no documentation of cannabis use or discussion between provider and patient took place. Among the subset of patients who had a discussion documented, 47% related to cannabis use for medical reasons, 35% related to a discussion of VA policy or legal issues, and 17% related to a discussion specific to medical risks or harm reduction strategies. In adjusted analyses, residents of states with legalized recreational cannabis were less likely to have any cannabis-related discussion compared to patients in non-legal states [OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.82]. Conclusions: One-third of LTOT patients did not have documentation of cannabis use in the chart in the 6 months following a positive UDT for cannabis. Discussions related to the medical risks of cannabis use or harm reduction strategies were uncommon. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zaman T, Bravata DM, Byers A, et al. A national study of clinical discussions about cannabis use among Veteran patients prescribed opioids. J Cannabis Res. 2024;6(1):12. Published 2024 Mar 16. doi:10.1186/s42238-024-00221-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/41906 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1186/s42238-024-00221-3 | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Cannabis Research | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Cannabis | |
dc.subject | Cannabis use in Veterans | |
dc.subject | Cannabis for pain | |
dc.subject | Cannabis documentation | |
dc.subject | Opioids | |
dc.title | A national study of clinical discussions about cannabis use among Veteran patients prescribed opioids | |
dc.type | Article |