Combining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Milnacipran for Fibromyalgia: A Feasibility Randomized-controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorAng, Dennis C.
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Mark P.
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorHilligoss, Janna
dc.contributor.authorGracely, Richard H.
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Chandan
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology, School of Science
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T14:27:26Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T14:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized-controlled trial and to obtain estimates of the effects of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Methods: Fifty-eight patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment arms: (1) combination therapy (n = 20); (2) milnacipran+education (n = 19); and (3) placebo+CBT (n = 19). Patients received either milnacipran (100 mg/d) or placebo. Patients also received 8 sessions of phone-delivered CBT or educational instructions, but only from baseline to week 9. Assessments were conducted at baseline, week 9, and 21. The primary endpoints were baseline to week 21 changes in weekly average pain intensity and physical function (SF-36 physical function scale). Results: Compared with milnacipran, combination therapy demonstrated a moderate effect on improving SF-36 physical function (SE = 9.42 [5.48], P = 0.09, effect size = 0.60) and in reducing weekly average pain intensity (mean difference [SE] = -1.18 [0.62], P = 0.07, effect size = 0.67). Compared with milnacipran, CBT had a moderate to large effect in improving SF-36 physical function (mean difference [SE] = 11.0 [5.66], P = 0.06, effect size = 0.70). Despite the presence of concomitant centrally acting therapies, dropout rate was lower than anticipated (15% at week 21). Importantly, at least 6 out of the 8 phone-based therapy sessions were successfully completed by 89% of the patients; and adherence to the treatment protocols was > 95%. Conclusions: In this pilot study, a therapeutic approach that combines phone-based CBT and milnacipran was feasible and acceptable. Moreover, the preliminary data supports conducting a fully powered randomized-controlled trial.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationAng DC, Jensen MP, Steiner JL, Hilligoss J, Gracely RH, Saha C. Combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and milnacipran for fibromyalgia: a feasibility randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(9):747-754. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827a784e
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/48301
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827a784e
dc.relation.journalThe Clinical Journal of Pain
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectFibromyalgia
dc.subjectCognitive behavioral therapy
dc.subjectMilnacipran
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectPhysical function
dc.titleCombining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Milnacipran for Fibromyalgia: A Feasibility Randomized-controlled Trial
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ang2013Combining-AAM.pdf
Size:
138.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: