Heterogeneity of Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry (2010-2016)

dc.contributor.authorJagannath, Sundar
dc.contributor.authorAbonour, Rafat
dc.contributor.authorDurie, Brian G. M.
dc.contributor.authorGasparetto, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorHardin, James W.
dc.contributor.authorNarang, Mohit
dc.contributor.authorTerebelo, Howard R.
dc.contributor.authorToomey, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Lynne
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Shankar
dc.contributor.authorKitali, Amani
dc.contributor.authorYue, Lihua
dc.contributor.authorFlick, E. Dawn
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Amit
dc.contributor.authorRifkin, Robert M.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T17:40:35Z
dc.date.available2019-03-21T17:40:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.description.abstractBackground The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has undergone recent changes with the regulatory approval of several new therapies indicated for second- and later-line disease. Using data from Connect MM, the largest multisite, primarily community-based, prospective, observational registry of MM patients in the United States, selection of second-line treatments was evaluated during a 5-year period from 2010 to 2016. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had newly diagnosed MM ≤ 2 months before study entry, and were followed for up to 8 years. Patients who received ≥ 2 lines of therapy were analyzed. “Tepee” plots of stacked area graphs differentiated treatments by color to allow visualization of second-line treatment trends in MM patients. Results As of February 2017, 855 of 2897 treated patients had progressed to second-line treatment. Treatment selection was heterogeneous; shifting patterns of treatment choices coincided with the approval status of newer agents. The most common treatment regimens in the early part of the decade were lenalidomide and/or bortezomib, with or without dexamethasone, with increasing use of newer agents (carfilzomib, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and elotuzumab) and triplet combinations over time. The influence of the baseline patient characteristics of age, history of diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and renal function on treatment choice was also examined. Conclusion These findings indicate that community physicians are current in their MM management practices, with uptake of new drugs and acquaintance with results of randomized clinical trials using combinations almost concurrent with their regulatory approval and publication.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationJagannath, S., Abonour, R., Durie, B. G. M., Gasparetto, C., Hardin, J. W., Narang, M., … Rifkin, R. M. (2018). Heterogeneity of Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry (2010-2016). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, 18(7), 480-485.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2018.04.007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/18674
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.clml.2018.04.007en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemiaen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectCommunityen_US
dc.subjectReal-worlden_US
dc.subjectRefractoryen_US
dc.subjectRelapseden_US
dc.subjectTherapiesen_US
dc.titleHeterogeneity of Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry (2010-2016)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2152265018300107-main.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: