Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial

dc.contributor.authorCuffari, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCiciora, Steven L
dc.contributor.authorAndo, Masakazu
dc.contributor.authorBoules, Mena
dc.contributor.authorCroffie, Joseph M.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T19:25:31Z
dc.date.available2022-01-10T19:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.description.abstractBowel preparation in children can be challenging. AIM To describe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) bowel preparation in children. METHODS Phase 3, randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter study of low-volume, divided dose SPMC enrolled children 9-16 years undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants 9-12 years were randomized 1:1:1 to SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Participants 13-16 years were randomized 1:1 to SPMC 1 dose × 2 or PEG. PEG-based bowel preparations were administered per local protocol. Primary efficacy endpoint for quality of bowel preparation was responders (rating of ‘excellent’ or ‘good’) by modified Aronchick Scale. Secondary efficacy endpoint was participant’s tolerability and satisfaction from a 7-item questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS 78 participants were randomized, 48 were 9-12 years, 30 were 13-16 years. For the primary efficacy endpoint in 9-12 years, 50.0%, 87.5%, and 81.3% were responders for SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, and PEG groups, respectively. Responder rates for 13-16 years were 81.3% for SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 85.7% for PEG. Overall, 43.8% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 reported it was ‘very easy’ or ‘easy’ to drink, compared with 20.0% receiving PEG. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 45.5% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 63.0% receiving PEG. CONCLUSION SPMC was an efficacious and safe for bowel preparation in children 9-16 years, with comparable efficacy to PEG. Tolerability for SPMC was higher compared to PEG.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationCuffari, C., Ciciora, S. L., Ando, M., Boules, M., & Croffie, J. M. (2020). Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 26(40), 6260–6269. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260en_US
dc.identifier.issn1007-9327en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/27335
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBaishideng Publishing Group Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260en_US
dc.relation.journalWorld Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectColonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectColon cleansingen_US
dc.subjectSodium picosulfateen_US
dc.subjectmagnesium oxideen_US
dc.subjectitric aciden_US
dc.subjectPolyethylene glycolen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.titlePediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pediatric.pdf
Size:
780.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: