Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorVest, Joshua R.
dc.contributor.authorJung, Hye-Young
dc.contributor.authorOstrovsky, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorDas, Lala Tanmoy
dc.contributor.authorMcGinty, Geraldine B.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T16:13:09Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T16:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Image sharing technologies may reduce unneeded imaging by improving provider access to imaging information. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the impact of image sharing technologies on patient imaging utilization. METHODS: Quantitative evaluations of the effects of PACS, regional image exchange networks, interoperable electronic heath records, tools for importing physical media, and health information exchange systems on utilization were identified through a systematic review of the published and gray English-language literature (2004-2014). Outcomes, standard effect sizes (ESs), settings, technology, populations, and risk of bias were abstracted from each study. The impact of image sharing technologies was summarized with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression models. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were included in the review, with a total of 42 different studies. Image sharing technology was associated with a significant decrease in repeat imaging (pooled effect size [ES] = -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-0.25, -0.09]; P < .001). However, image sharing technology was associated with a significant increase in any imaging utilization (pooled ES = 0.20; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.32]; P = .002). For all outcomes combined, image sharing technology was not associated with utilization. Most studies were at risk for bias. CONCLUSIONS: Image sharing technology was associated with reductions in repeat and unnecessary imaging, in both the overall literature and the most-rigorous studies. Stronger evidence is needed to further explore the role of specific technologies and their potential impact on various modalities, patient populations, and settings.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationVest, J. R., Jung, H.-Y., Ostrovsky, A., Das, L. T., & McGinty, G. B. (2015). Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 12(12 0 0), 1371–1379.e3. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12984
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.014en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American College of Radiology en_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectHealth information exchangeen_US
dc.subjectData sharingen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectRadiology information systemsen_US
dc.subjectUtilizationen_US
dc.titleImage Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms752025.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: