Documentation of specific mesh implant at the time of midurethral sling surgery in women with stress incontinence

dc.contributor.authorKassis, Nadine C.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jennifer C.
dc.contributor.authorScheidler, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorHale, Douglass S.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-30T21:05:50Z
dc.date.available2015-12-30T21:05:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to assess documentation completeness of the operative record for mesh implanted at the time of midurethral sling surgery and to identify modifiable predictors of documentation completeness. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of women with stress incontinence who underwent midurethral sling placement between January 2009 and December 2011 was conducted. Data from the dictated operative note and nursing operative record were extracted to determine if the specific mesh implanted during surgery was documented. The primary outcome was the rate of documentation of mesh implanted in the physician's dictated operative note and in the nursing record. Logistic regression was used to determine if any characteristics were associated with the rate of documentation while accounting for correlation of patients from the same dictating surgeon. Results: There were 816 surgeries involving the implantation of a midurethral sling during the study period. All surgeries were performed at 6 Indiana University hospitals. Fifty-two surgeons of varying specialties and levels of training dictated the operative notes. A urogynecologist dictated 71% of the operative notes. The rate of documentation completeness for mesh implanted in the physician's note was 10%. The rate of documentation completeness for mesh implanted in the nursing operative record was 92%. Documentation of mesh implanted in the physician's note was not significantly associated with the level of training, specialty, or year of surgery. Conclusions: Documentation completeness for specific mesh implant in the physician's note is low, independent of specialty and level of training. Nursing documentation practices are more rigorous. Postmarket surveillance, currently mandated by the Food and Drug Administration, may not be feasible if only the physician's note is available or if nursing practices are inconsistent. Development of documentation guidelines for physicians would improve the feasibility of surveillance.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationKassis, N. C., Thompson, J. C., Scheidler, A. M., Daggy, J. K., & Hale, D. S. (2015). Documentation of Specific Mesh Implant at the Time of Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women With Stress Incontinence. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 21(1), 43–45. http://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000106en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7868
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SPV.0000000000000106en_US
dc.relation.journalFemale Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectstress incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectmidurethral sling placementen_US
dc.subjectmesh implanten_US
dc.titleDocumentation of specific mesh implant at the time of midurethral sling surgery in women with stress incontinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kassis_2015_documentation.pdf
Size:
110.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: