Safety and efficacy of hot avulsion as an adjunct to endoscopic mucosal resection (with videos)

Abstract

Background Excision of all visible neoplastic tissue is the goal of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Flat and fibrotic tissue can resist snaring. Ablation of visible polyps is associated with high recurrence rates. Avulsion is a technique to continue resection when snaring fails. Methods We retrospectively analyzed colonic EMRs of 564 consecutive referred polyps between 2015 and 2017. Hot avulsion was used when snaring was unsuccessful. Polyps treated with and without avulsion were compared. Results Hot avulsion was used in 20.9% (n=112) of all resected lesions. The recurrence rates on follow up colonoscopy were 17.52% in avulsion group versus 16.02% in the non-avulsion group (p= 0.76). Hot avulsion was associated with a trend toward higher rates of delayed hemorrhage (5.35% vs 2.58%; p=0.15) and post-coagulation syndrome (1.8% vs 0.47%; p=0.15), but polyps treated with any avulsion were larger than those in which no avulsion was used (p=<0.001). There were an insufficient number of adverse events to perform a multivariable analysis testing the effects of avulsion, size, and location on the risk of overall adverse events. Conclusion Unlike previous reports of using argon plasma coagulation to treat visible polyp during EMR, hot avulsion of visible/fibrotic neoplasia was associated with similar EMR efficacy compared with cases that did not require hot avulsion. The safety profile of hot avulsion appears acceptable.