Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Dhruv
dc.contributor.authorCampiti, Vincent J.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorSaltagi, Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Aaron E.
dc.contributor.authorTing, Jonathan Y.
dc.contributor.authorIlling, Elisa A.
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jae Hong
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Rick F.
dc.contributor.authorBurgin, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-09T20:41:05Z
dc.date.available2021-04-09T20:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.description.abstractObjective The risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission to healthcare workers through airborne aerosolization during otologic surgery has not been characterized. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery. Methods The number concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 μm were quantified using an optical particle sizer during both a cadaveric simulation of routine otologic procedures as well as cochlear implant surgery on live patients in the operating room. Results In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest using cold techniques (without electrocautery) (n = 4) did not generate aerosols above baseline concentrations. Tympanoplasty (n = 3) and mastoidectomy (n = 3) both produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols (P < 0.05), predominantly submicron particles (< 1.0 μm). High‐speed, powered drilling of the temporal bone during mastoidectomy with a Multi Flute cutting burr resulted in higher peak concentrations and greater number of spikes in aerosols than with a diamond burr. In the operating room, spikes in aerosols occurred during both cochlear implant surgeries. Conclusion In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest without electrocautery did not generate aerosol levels above baseline, while significant aerosol levels were generated during mastoidectomy and to a much less degree during tympanoplasty. Aerosol spikes were appreciated during cochlear implantation surgery in live patients.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationSharma, D., Campiti, V. J., Ye, M. J., Saltagi, M., Carroll, A. E., Ting, J. Y., ... & Burgin, S. J. (2021). Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 6(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.506en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/25618
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/lio2.506en_US
dc.relation.journalLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngologyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectaerosol-generating procedureen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectmastoidectomyen_US
dc.titleAerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharma2020Aerosol.pdf
Size:
3.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: