Turnaround Time Between ILLiad’s Odyssey and Ariel Delivery Methods: A Comparison

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2006-08
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Haworth Press
Abstract

Interlibrary loan departments are frequently looking for ways to reduce turnaround time. The advent of electronic delivery in the past decade has greatly reduced turnaround time for articles, but recent developments in this arena have the potential to decrease that time even further. The ILLiad ILL management system has an electronic delivery component, Odyssey, with a Trusted Sender setting that allows articles to be sent to patrons without borrowing staff intervention, provided the lending library is designated as a Trusted Sender, or this feature is enabled for all lenders. Using the tracking data created by the ILLiad management system, the turnaround time for two delivery methods, Ariel and Odyssey, was captured for two different academic institutions. With the Trusted Sender setting turned on, Odyssey delivery was faster than Ariel for the institutions studied.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Connell, R.S., & Janke, K.L. (2006). Turnaround Time between ILLiad’s Odyssey and Ariel Delivery Methods: A Comparison. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery, and Electronic Reserve, 16 (3), 41-56.
ISSN
1072-303X
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
95638 bytes
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}