A Clinically Relevant Method of Analyzing Continuous Change in Robotic Upper Extremity Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation

dc.contributor.authorMassie, Crystal L.
dc.contributor.authorDu, Yue
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Susan S.
dc.contributor.authorKrebs, H. Igo
dc.contributor.authorWittenberg, George F.
dc.contributor.authorBever, Christopher T.
dc.contributor.authorWhitall, Jill
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-22T17:28:24Z
dc.date.available2017-03-22T17:28:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.description.abstractBackground. Robots designed for rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke facilitate high rates of repetition during practice of movements and record precise kinematic data, providing a method to investigate motor recovery profiles over time. Objective. To determine how motor recovery profiles during robotic interventions provide insight into improving clinical gains. Methods. A convenience sample (n = 22), from a larger randomized control trial, was taken of chronic stroke participants completing 12 sessions of arm therapy. One group received 60 minutes of robotic therapy (Robot only) and the other group received 45 minutes on the robot plus 15 minutes of translation-to-task practice (Robot + TTT). Movement time was assessed using the robot without powered assistance. Analyses (ANOVA, random coefficient modeling [RCM] with 2-term exponential function) were completed to investigate changes across the intervention, between sessions, and within a session. Results. Significant improvement (P < .05) in movement time across the intervention (pre vs post) was similar between the groups but there were group differences for changes between and within sessions (P < .05). The 2-term exponential function revealed a fast and slow component of learning that described performance across consecutive blocks. The RCM identified individuals who were above or below the marginal model. Conclusions. The expanded analyses indicated that changes across time can occur in different ways but achieve similar goals and may be influenced by individual factors such as initial movement time. These findings will guide decisions regarding treatment planning based on rates of motor relearning during upper extremity stroke robotic interventions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMassie, C. L., Du, Y., Conroy, S. S., Krebs, H. I., Wittenberg, G. F., Bever, C. T., & Whitall, J. (2016). A clinically relevant method of analyzing continuous change in robotic upper extremity chronic stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 30(8), 703-712.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12098
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/1545968315620301en_US
dc.relation.journalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repairen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectstrokeen_US
dc.subjectrobotic treatmenten_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.titleA Clinically Relevant Method of Analyzing Continuous Change in Robotic Upper Extremity Chronic Stroke Rehabilitationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Massie_2016_clinically.pdf
Size:
172.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: