Impact of Geographical Cohorting in the ICU: An Academic Tertiary Care Center Experience

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2020-09-25
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wolters Kluwer
Abstract

ICU is a multifaceted organization where multiple teams care for critically ill patients. In the current era, collaboration between teams and efficient workflows form the backbone of value-based care. Geographical cohorting is a widespread model for hospitalist rounding, but its role in ICUs is unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of geographical cohorting in a large ICU of an Academic Health Center.

Design: This is a retrospective analysis of quality metrics collected 12 months pre- and post-implementation of geographical cohorting.

Setting: A total of 130 bedded ICU at tertiary academic health center in Midwest.

Patients: All patients admitted to the ICU.

Interventions: Our institution piloted the geographical cohorting model for critical care physician rounding on September 1, 2018.

Measurements: The quality metrics were categorized as ICU harm events and ICU hospital metrics. Team of critical care providers were surveyed 12 months after implementation.

Main results: The critical care utilization in the pre- and post-implementation numbers were similar for patient days (pre = 34,839, post = 35,155), central-line days (pre = 17,648, post = 19,224), and Foley catheter days (pre = 18,292, post = 17,364). The ICU length of stay was similar (4.9 d) in both pre- and post-intervention periods. Significant reduction in the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (relative risk, -0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96; p = 0.039), hospital-acquired pressure injury (relative risk, -0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; p = 0.020), central line-associated bloodstream infection incidence (relative risk, -0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.52; p = 0.008), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (relative risk, -0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.93; p = 0.027). Healthcare providers perceived optimal utilization of their time, reduced interruptions, and improved coordination of care with geographical rounding.

Conclusions: Geographical cohorting improves coordination of care, physician workflow, and critical care quality metrics in very large ICUs.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Kapoor, R., Gupta, N., Roberts, S. D., Naum, C., Perkins, A. J., & Khan, B. A. (2020). Impact of Geographical Cohorting in the ICU: An Academic Tertiary Care Center Experience. Critical Care Explorations, 2(10), e0212. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000212
ISSN
2639-8028
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Critical Care Explorations
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}