Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices

dc.contributor.authorThyvalikakath, Thankam Paul
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, William D.
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, Zasim
dc.contributor.authorLaPradd, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George
dc.contributor.authorSchleyer, Titus
dc.contributor.authorRindal, Donald Brad
dc.contributor.authorJurkovich, Mark
dc.contributor.authorShea, Tracy
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Gregg H.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T16:38:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-02T16:38:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR). Methods: Ninety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location. Results: Eighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset. Conclusion: This study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationThyvalikakath TP, Duncan WD, Siddiqui Z, et al. Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices. Appl Clin Inform. 2020;11(2):305-314. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1709506en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29705
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThiemeen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-0040-1709506en_US
dc.relation.journalApplied Clinical Informaticsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectDental recorden_US
dc.subjectData qualityen_US
dc.subjectElectronic health recorden_US
dc.titleLeveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190390/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
10-1055-s-0040-1709506.pdf
Size:
376.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: