Treating electrostatics with Wolf summation in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical simulations

dc.contributor.authorOjeda-May, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorPu, Jingzhi
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, IU School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-20T20:16:17Z
dc.date.available2015-11-20T20:16:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.description.abstractThe Wolf summation approach [D. Wolf et al., J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8254 (1999)], in the damped shifted force (DSF) formalism [C. J. Fennell and J. D. Gezelter, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 234104 (2006)], is extended for treating electrostatics in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) molecular dynamics simulations. In this development, we split the QM/MM electrostatic potential energy function into the conventional Coulomb r −1 term and a term that contains the DSF contribution. The former is handled by the standard machinery of cutoff-based QM/MM simulations whereas the latter is incorporated into the QM/MM interaction Hamiltonian as a Fock matrix correction. We tested the resulting QM/MM-DSF method for two solution-phase reactions, i.e., the association of ammonium and chloride ions and a symmetric SN2 reaction in which a methyl group is exchanged between two chloride ions. The performance of the QM/MM-DSF method was assessed by comparing the potential of mean force (PMF) profiles with those from the QM/MM-Ewald and QM/MM-isotropic periodic sum (IPS) methods, both of which include long-range electrostatics explicitly. For ion association, the QM/MM-DSF method successfully eliminates the artificial free energy drift observed in the QM/MM-Cutoff simulations, in a remarkable agreement with the two long-range-containing methods. For the SN2 reaction, the free energy of activation obtained by the QM/MM-DSF method agrees well with both the QM/MM-Ewald and QM/MM-IPS results. The latter, however, requires a greater cutoff distance than QM/MM-DSF for a proper convergence of the PMF. Avoiding time-consuming lattice summation, the QM/MM-DSF method yields a 55% reduction in computational cost compared with the QM/MM-Ewald method. These results suggest that, in addition to QM/MM-IPS, the QM/MM-DSF method may serve as another efficient and accurate alternative to QM/MM-Ewald for treating electrostatics in condensed-phase simulations of chemical reactions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationOjeda-May, P., & Pu, J. (2015). Treating electrostatics with Wolf summation in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical simulations. The Journal of chemical physics, 143(17), 174111.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7520
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAIPen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1063/1.4934880en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Chemical Physicsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectelectrostaticsen_US
dc.subjectWolf summation approachen_US
dc.titleTreating electrostatics with Wolf summation in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical simulationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ojeda-May_2015_treating.pdf
Size:
280.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: