Cost Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Detecting Cirrhosis in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Based on United States Health Care System
Date
Language
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract
Background & Aims Several strategies are available for detecting cirrhosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but their cost effectiveness is not clear. We developed a decision model to quantify the accuracy and costs of 9 single or combination strategies, including 3 noninvasive tests (fibrosis-4 [FIB-4], vibration controlled transient elastography [VCTE], and magnetic resonance elastography [MRE]) and liver biopsy, for detection of cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD. Methods Data on diagnostic accuracy, costs, adverse events, and cirrhosis outcomes over a 5-y period were obtained from publications. The diagnostic accuracy, per-patient cost per correct diagnosis of cirrhosis, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated for each strategy for base cirrhosis prevalence values of 0.27%, 2%, and 4%. Results The combination of the FIB-4 and VCTE identified patients with cirrhosis in NAFLD populations with a 0.27%, 2%, and 4% prevalence of cirrhosis with the lowest cost per person ($401, $690, and $1024, respectively) and highest diagnostic accuracy (89.3%, 88.5%, and 87.5% respectively). The combination of FIB-4 and MRE ranked second in cost per person ($491, $781, and $1114, respectively) and diagnostic accuracy (92.4%, 91.6%, 90.6%, respectively). Compared to the combination of FIB-4 and VCTE (least costly), the ICERs were lower for the combination of FIB-4 and MRE ($2864, $2918, and $2921) than the combination of FIB-4 and liver biopsy ($4454, $5156, and $5956) at the cirrhosis prevalence values tested. When goal was to avoid liver biopsy, FIB-4+VCTE and FIB-4+MRE had similar diagnostic accuracies, ranging from 87.5% to 89.3% and 90.6% to 92.4% for cirrhosis diagnosis, although FIB-4+MRE had a slightly higher cost. Conclusions In our cost effectiveness analysis based on United States health care system, we found that results from FIB-4, followed by either VCTE, MRE, or liver biopsy, detect cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD with a high level of accuracy and low cost. Compared to FIB-4 + VCTE which was the least costly strategy, FIB-4+MRE had lower ICER than FIB-4+LB.