Clinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

dc.contributor.authorPerry, David C.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jesse A.
dc.contributor.authorPossin, Katherine L.
dc.contributor.authorDatta, Samir
dc.contributor.authorTrujillo, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRadke, Anneliese
dc.contributor.authorKarydas, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKornak, John
dc.contributor.authorSias, Ana C.
dc.contributor.authorRabinovici, Gil D.
dc.contributor.authorGorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
dc.contributor.authorBoxer, Adam L.
dc.contributor.authorMay, Mary De
dc.contributor.authorRankin, Katherine P.
dc.contributor.authorSturm, Virginia E.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Suzee E.
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Brandy R.
dc.contributor.authorKao, Aimee W.
dc.contributor.authorVossel, Keith A.
dc.contributor.authorTartaglia, Maria Carmela
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Zachary A.
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Sang Won
dc.contributor.authorSidhu, Manu
dc.contributor.authorGaus, Stephanie E.
dc.contributor.authorNana, Alissa L.
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Jose Norberto S.
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Ji-Hye L.
dc.contributor.authorOssenkoppele, Rik
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Alainna B.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Eric J.
dc.contributor.authorCoppola, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Howard J.
dc.contributor.authorGeschwind, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTrojanowski, John Q.
dc.contributor.authorGrinberg, Lea T.
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Joel H.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Bruce L.
dc.contributor.authorSeely, William W.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-23T20:08:16Z
dc.date.available2019-05-23T20:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.description.abstractAccurately predicting the underlying neuropathological diagnosis in patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) poses a daunting challenge for clinicians but will be critical for the success of disease-modifying therapies. We sought to improve pathological prediction by exploring clinicopathological correlations in a large bvFTD cohort. Among 438 patients in whom bvFTD was either the top or an alternative possible clinical diagnosis, 117 had available autopsy data, including 98 with a primary pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), 15 with Alzheimer's disease, and four with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who lacked neurodegenerative disease-related pathology outside of the motor system. Patients with FTLD were distributed between FTLD-tau (34 patients: 10 corticobasal degeneration, nine progressive supranuclear palsy, eight Pick's disease, three frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism associated with chromosome 17, three unclassifiable tauopathy, and one argyrophilic grain disease); FTLD-TDP (55 patients: nine type A including one with motor neuron disease, 27 type B including 21 with motor neuron disease, eight type C with right temporal lobe presentations, and 11 unclassifiable including eight with motor neuron disease), FTLD-FUS (eight patients), and one patient with FTLD-ubiquitin proteasome system positive inclusions (FTLD-UPS) that stained negatively for tau, TDP-43, and FUS. Alzheimer's disease was uncommon (6%) among patients whose only top diagnosis during follow-up was bvFTD. Seventy-nine per cent of FTLD-tau, 86% of FTLD-TDP, and 88% of FTLD-FUS met at least 'possible' bvFTD diagnostic criteria at first presentation. The frequency of the six core bvFTD diagnostic features was similar in FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP, suggesting that these features alone cannot be used to separate patients by major molecular class. Voxel-based morphometry revealed that nearly all pathological subgroups and even individual patients share atrophy in anterior cingulate, frontoinsula, striatum, and amygdala, indicating that degeneration of these regions is intimately linked to the behavioural syndrome produced by these diverse aetiologies. In addition to these unifying features, symptom profiles also differed among pathological subtypes, suggesting distinct anatomical vulnerabilities and informing a clinician's prediction of pathological diagnosis. Data-driven classification into one of the 10 most common pathological diagnoses was most accurate (up to 60.2%) when using a combination of known predictive factors (genetic mutations, motor features, or striking atrophy patterns) and the results of a discriminant function analysis that incorporated clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological data.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPerry, D. C., Brown, J. A., Possin, K. L., Datta, S., Trujillo, A., Radke, A., … Seeley, W. W. (2017). Clinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain : a journal of neurology, 140(12), 3329–3345. doi:10.1093/brain/awx254en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/19459
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/brain/awx254en_US
dc.relation.journalBrain : a journal of neurologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectFrontotemporal dementiaen_US
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPick’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectCorticobasal degenerationen_US
dc.subjectFrontotemporal lobar degenerationen_US
dc.titleClinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841140/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
awx254.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: