Evaluation of Faculty Mentoring Practices in Seven U.S. Dental Schools

dc.contributor.authorAl-Jewair, Thikriat
dc.contributor.authorHerbert, Amy Kristina
dc.contributor.authorLeggitt, V. Leroy
dc.contributor.authorWare, Tawana Lee
dc.contributor.authorHogge, Maritzabel
dc.contributor.authorSenior, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Rebecca K.
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, John D.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T20:37:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T20:37:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this cross‐sectional study was to examine the faculty mentoring practices in seven dental schools in the U.S. A 34‐item survey was administered electronically to dental faculty members of all ranks, tracks, and job categories in seven dental schools using faculty listservs. Survey questions addressed current mentoring practices in which the faculty members were involved; their perceptions of those mentoring practices; their perceived characteristics of an ideal mentoring program, mentor, and mentee; perceived best practices; and respondents’ demographics. The survey was conducted from October 2017 to February 2018. A total of 154 surveys were completed (response rate 22%). Over 58% (90/154) of the respondents reported receiving no mentoring; 31.9% (49/154) said they received informal mentoring; and 9.7% (15/154) received formal mentoring. Of the 64 respondents who received mentoring, both formal and informal, 92.2% (59/64) were full‐time faculty, and 7.8% (5/64) were part‐time faculty (p=0.001). Approximately 39% of the respondents indicated that their mentoring program was not overseen by anyone and that participation was voluntary. The top three perceived benefits of mentoring were increased overall professional development, development of a career plan, and increased professional networks. The three most important characteristics of an ideal mentoring program for the respondents were a program based on the needs of the mentee, a mentor who has the desire to help the mentee, and a mentee who is eager to learn. The results of this study showed a very low level of formal or informal faculty mentoring programs in the dental schools surveyed. Future studies are needed to determine best practices and strategies to expand and enhance mentoring of faculty members.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationAl‐Jewair, T., Herbert, A. K., Leggitt, V. L., Ware, T. L., Hogge, M., Senior, C., Carr, R. K., & Silva, J. D. D. (2019). Evaluation of Faculty Mentoring Practices in Seven U.S. Dental Schools. Journal of Dental Education, 83(12), 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.136en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24391
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.21815/JDE.019.136en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dental Educationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectpredoctoral dental educationen_US
dc.subjectfacultyen_US
dc.subjectfaculty developmenten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Faculty Mentoring Practices in Seven U.S. Dental Schoolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Al-Jewair_2019_evaluation.pdf
Size:
431.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: