Deconstructing Faculty Status: Research and Assumptions
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
1993
Authors
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract
Arguments for faculty status have traditionally been based upon a comparative model: librarians want their roles to be compared to those of faculty, not administrators. The author of this article, however, finds almost no empirical research on the status, roles, and benefits of faculty, librarians, and administrators to support this model. She posits several alternative approaches to the faculty status issue.
Description
This post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of the article submitted to IUPUI ScholarWorks as part of the OASIS Project.
Keywords
LC Subjects
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Applegate, Rachel. "Deconstructing faculty status: Research and assumptions." The Journal of Academic Librarianship 19, no. 3 (July 1993): 158-64.
Applegate, Rachel. "Deconstructing faculty status: Research and assumptions." October 19, 2010. Available from IUPUI ScholarWorks. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2284.
Applegate, Rachel. "Deconstructing faculty status: Research and assumptions." October 19, 2010. Available from IUPUI ScholarWorks. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2284.
ISSN
0099-1333
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article