Deconstructing Faculty Status: Research and Assumptions

Date
1993
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract

Arguments for faculty status have traditionally been based upon a comparative model: librarians want their roles to be compared to those of faculty, not administrators. The author of this article, however, finds almost no empirical research on the status, roles, and benefits of faculty, librarians, and administrators to support this model. She posits several alternative approaches to the faculty status issue.

Description
This post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of the article submitted to IUPUI ScholarWorks as part of the OASIS Project.
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Applegate, Rachel. "Deconstructing faculty status: Research and assumptions." The Journal of Academic Librarianship 19, no. 3 (July 1993): 158-64.
Applegate, Rachel. "Deconstructing faculty status: Research and assumptions." October 19, 2010. Available from IUPUI ScholarWorks. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2284.
ISSN
0099-1333
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Rights
The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited.
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}