Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question
dc.contributor.author | Carmichael, Chad | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Philosophy, School of Liberal Arts | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-24T16:15:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-24T16:15:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | The special composition question is the question, ‘When do some things compose something?’ The answers to this question in the literature have largely been at odds with common sense, either by allowing that any two things (no matter how apparently unrelated) compose something, or by denying the existence of most ordinary composite objects. I propose a new ‘series-style’ answer to the special composition question that accords much more closely with common sense, and I defend this answer from van Inwagen's objections. Specifically, I will argue (among other things) that the proposed answer entails the transitivity of parthood, that it is non-circular, and that it casts some light on the ancient puzzle about the Ship of Theseus. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Carmichael, C. (2015). Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 475–490. http://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.989397 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/8474 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1080/00048402.2014.989397 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.rights | IUPUI Open Access Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | composition | en_US |
dc.subject | common sense | en_US |
dc.title | Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |