Valuing innovative endoscopic techniques: prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps

dc.contributor.authorShah, Eric D.
dc.contributor.authorPohl, Heiko
dc.contributor.authorRex, Douglas K.
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Michael B.
dc.contributor.authorCrockett, Seth D.
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Shannon J.
dc.contributor.authorFeagins, Linda A.
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Ryan
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T17:53:31Z
dc.date.available2020-04-23T17:53:31Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims Clip closure of the mucosal defect after resecting large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps reduces postprocedure bleeding and is cost saving for payers. Clip costs are not reimbursed by payers, posing a major barrier to adoption of this technique in the community. We aimed to determine appropriate clip costs to support broader use of this procedure in practice. Methods We performed budget impact analysis using our recent decision analytic model, comparing prophylactic clip closure with no clip closure on national cost and outcomes data, to determine the maximum feasible clip price while maintaining cost savings in practice. Sensitivity analyses were performed on important clinical factors. Results In the original model, the baseline postprocedure bleeding risk was 6.8%, increasing cost of care by $614.11 averaged among all patients undergoing large polyp resection without clip closure. Prophylactic clip closure of only large right-sided polyps reduced postprocedure bleeding risk by 70.7% but resulted in cost saving only if the price of clips was $100 or less. Comparatively, prophylactic clip closure of large left-sided polyps had no clinical benefit and was not cost saving. Clip closure strategies focused only on extra-large polyps (≥40 mm), or patients taking antithrombotics regardless of polyp characteristics, were only minimally cost saving. Cost savings and maximum tolerated clip prices depended on medical comorbidity, which directly influences the costs of care to manage postprocedure bleeding. Conclusions Prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps, particularly those in the right colon segment, is cost saving but requires clip costs less than $100. Translating these findings into practice requires gastroenterology practices to obtain reimbursement from payers for improved clinical outcomes and to align commercial clip prices with this clinical indication.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationShah, E. D., Pohl, H., Rex, D. K., Wallace, M. B., Crockett, S. D., Morales, S. J., ... & Law, R. (2020). Valuing Innovative Endoscopic Techniques: Prophylactic Clip Closure After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22613
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.018en_US
dc.relation.journalGastrointestinal Endoscopyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjecthemoclipen_US
dc.subjectendoclipen_US
dc.subjectendoscopic mucosal resectionen_US
dc.titleValuing innovative endoscopic techniques: prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic resection of large colon polypsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shah_2020_valuing.pdf
Size:
1.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: