Risk for Persistent Peripheral Neuropathy After Repair of Brachial Artery Injuries

dc.contributor.authorLoewenstein, Scott N.
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Corianne
dc.contributor.authorKukushliev, Vasil V.
dc.contributor.authorAdkinson, Joshua
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T17:54:57Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T17:54:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-09
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brachial artery lacerations are limb-threatening injuries requiring emergent repair. Concomitant peripheral nerve symptoms are often only identified postoperatively. This study evaluated the prevalence of peripheral nerve deficits among this population as the indications for early nerve exploration have not been definitively established. Methods: We reviewed all patients sustaining a brachial artery injury at one pediatric and two adult Level I Trauma Centers between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities, intoxication status, injury mechanism, concomitant injuries, type of repair, and intraoperative peripheral nerve exploration findings. Pre-and post-operative and long-term peripheral nerve function examination findings were analyzed. Differences between categorical variables were determined with Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Thirty-four patients sustained traumatic brachial artery lacerations requiring operative repair. Injury mechanisms included tidy (clean cut) laceration (n=11, 32%), gunshot wound (n=9, 26%), blunt trauma (n=8, 24%), and untidy laceration (n=6, 18%). Preoperatively, 15% had a normal peripheral nerve examination, 26% had localizable symptoms, 38% had non-localizable symptoms, and 21% were taken to the operating room without formal nerve assessment. Thirty-two percent underwent formal nerve exploration, and 81% underwent nerve repair. At an average follow-up of 2.5 years, 27% of patients underwent exploration, and 39% did not have localizable peripheral nerve deficits (p=0.705). Conclusions: Brachial artery injuries are associated with a clinically significant risk for long-term peripheral nerve symptoms. Early nerve exploration in patients with peripheral nerve symptoms after a brachial artery injury may be warranted, although there is no statistically significant likelihood for improved peripheral neurological outcomes.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLoewenstein SN, Rogers C, Kukushliev VV, Adkinson J. Risk for Persistent Peripheral Neuropathy After Repair of Brachial Artery Injuries. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e22997. Published 2022 Mar 9. doi:10.7759/cureus.22997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33729
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCureusen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.22997en_US
dc.relation.journalCureusen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedic hand surgeryen_US
dc.subjectBrachial artery transectionen_US
dc.subjectBrachialen_US
dc.subjectSensitive neuropathyen_US
dc.subjectMotor neuropathyen_US
dc.titleRisk for Persistent Peripheral Neuropathy After Repair of Brachial Artery Injuriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cureus-0014-00000022997.pdf
Size:
289.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: