Improving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessment

dc.contributor.authorAre, Vijay S.
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Shannon M.
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Ambar
dc.contributor.authorShamseddeen, Hani
dc.contributor.authorGhabril, Marwan
dc.contributor.authorOrman, Eric
dc.contributor.authorPatidar, Kavish R.
dc.contributor.authorChalasani, Naga
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Archita P.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-18T18:02:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-18T18:02:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: With increasing burden of obesity and liver disease in the United States, a better understanding of bariatric surgery in context of cirrhosis is needed. We described trends of hospital-based outcomes of bariatric surgery among cirrhotics and determined effect of volume status and type of surgery on these outcomes. Methods: In this population-based study, admissions for bariatric surgery were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes from 2004 to 2016 and grouped by cirrhosis status, type of bariatric surgery, and center volume. In-hospital mortality, complications, and their trends were compared between these groups using weighted counts, odds ratios [ORs], and logistic regression. Results: Among 1,679,828 admissions for bariatric surgery, 9,802 (0.58%) had cirrhosis. Cirrhosis admissions were more likely to be in white men, had higher Elixhauser Index, and higher in-hospital complications rates including death (1.81% vs 0.17%), acute kidney injury (4.5% vs 1.2%), bleeding (2.9% vs 1.1%), and operative complications (2% vs 0.6%) (P < 0.001 for all) compared to those without cirrhosis. Overtime, restrictive surgeries have grown in number (12%-71%) and complications rates have trended down in both groups. Cirrhotics undergoing bariatric surgery at low-volume centers (<50 procedures per year) and nonrestrictive surgery had a higher inpatient mortality rate (adjusted OR 4.50, 95% confidence interval 3.14-6.45, adjusted OR 4.00, 95% confidence interval 2.68-5.97, respectively). Discussion: Contemporary data indicate that among admissions for bariatric surgery, there is a shift to restrictive-type surgeries with an improvement in-hospital complications and mortality. However, patients with cirrhosis especially those at low-volume centers have significantly higher risk of worse outcomes (see Visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B648).en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationAre VS, Knapp SM, Banerjee A, et al. Improving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(11):1849-1856. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000911en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29830
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.14309/ajg.0000000000000911en_US
dc.relation.journalThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAcute kidney injuryen_US
dc.subjectBariatric surgeryen_US
dc.subjectLiver cirrhosisen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseen_US
dc.titleImproving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1677239.pdf
Size:
670.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: