Discrete and Coalescing Pustules Masking Severe Recalcitrant Rosacea due to Demodex

dc.contributor.authorStefanie Ali, Chase Wilson
dc.contributor.authorMegan Brinkworth, Nico Mousdicas
dc.contributor.departmentDermatology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T20:27:02Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T20:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractWe describe a clinical case concerning a 36 year old man with a recalcitrant dermatosis involving the face and neck to demonstrate how multiple pathogenic mechanisms may ultimately prohibit disease resolution. This patient’s disease persisted despite multiple standard treatments for the leading differential diagnoses early in the disease course including: topical/systemic corticosteroids for an initially suspected facial dermatitis followed by minocycline and oral ivermectin for granulomatous rosacea with high Demodex burden. These failed therapies prompted the use of oral prednisone and topical pimecrolimus that resulted in some improvement but worsening flares if therapy was discontinued. The leading differential shifted toward rosacea fulminans or an unusual manifestation of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in the setting of possible HIV or iatrogenic immunosuppression. An extensive diagnostic workup was completed and showed isolated IgM deficiency (49 mg/dl, normal range 60 to 300 mg/dl), low levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (15 pg/mL, normal range 18 to 64 pg/mL), and low ascorbic acid (0.3 mg/dl, normal range 0.6 to 2.0 mg/dl). The rash finally resolved following a tapering course of cyclosporine and vitamin repletion through supplements and dietary alteration. Our case is one with multiple confounding variables that may have contributed to the recalcitrant nature of this dermatosis: (1) presence of Demodex; (2) iatrogenic immunosuppression due to prolonged systemic and topical steroid use; and (3) vitamin deficiency. It is unclear exactly what role each of these factors played but the purpose of our case is to illustrate these variables can be encountered in regular practice and that sometimes the physician must explore and correct all potential vectors of pathogenesis in order to successfully treat recalcitrant dermatoses.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationStefanie Ali, C. W., & Megan Brinkworth, N. M. (2015). Discrete and Coalescing Pustules Masking Severe Recalcitrant Rosacea due to Demodex. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research, 06(05). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9554.10000298en_US
dc.identifier.issn21559554en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/17752
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOMICS Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4172/2155-9554.10000298en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Researchen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourceOtheren_US
dc.subjectRosaceaen_US
dc.subjectDemodexen_US
dc.subjectVitamin deficiencyen_US
dc.titleDiscrete and Coalescing Pustules Masking Severe Recalcitrant Rosacea due to Demodexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Discrete_and_Coalescing_Pustules_Masking_Severe_Re.pdf
Size:
516.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: