Molecular Classification of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Using NanoString-Based Gene Expression Analysis

dc.contributor.authorLopez-Beltran, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBlanca, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCimadamore, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorGogna, Rajan
dc.contributor.authorMontironi, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Liang
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T16:37:12Z
dc.date.available2023-04-03T16:37:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01
dc.description.abstractMolecular classification of bladder carcinoma is a relevant topic in modern bladder cancer oncology due to its potential to improve oncological outcomes. The available molecular classifications are generally based on transcriptomic profiles, generating highly diverse categories with limited correlation. Implementation of molecular classification in practice is typically limited due to the high complexity of the required technology, the elevated costs, and the limited availability of this technology worldwide. We have conducted a gene expression analysis using a four-gene panel related to luminal and basal subtypes in a series of 91 bladder cancer cases. NanoString-based gene expression analysis using typically luminal (GATA3+/KRT20+) and basal markers (KRT14+/KRT5+/GATA3low/-/KRT20low/-) classified urothelial bladder carcinoma samples as luminal, basal, and a third category (KRT14-/KRT5-/GATA3-/KRT20-), null/double negative (non-luminal/non-basal). These three categories were meaningful in terms of overall cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001) or when classified as conventional urothelial carcinoma and variant histology urothelial carcinoma (p < 0.0001), NMIBC vs. MIBC (p < 0.001), or by AJCC stage category Ta (p = 0.0012) and T1 (p < 0.0001) but did not reach significance in T2-T4 (p = 0.563). PD-L1 expression (low vs. high) was also different according to molecular subtype, with high PD-L1 expression mostly seen in basal and null subtypes and carcinomas with variant histology (p = 0.002). Additionally, the luminal subtype was enriched in NMIBC with favorable cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001). In contrast, basal and null subtypes resulted in aggressive MIBC tumors with shorter cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001), some of which presented variant histology. In conclusion, a comprehensive evaluation of a gene classifier related to molecular taxonomy using NanoString technology is feasible. Therefore, it might represent an accessible and affordable tool in this rapidly expanding area of precision genomics.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLopez-Beltran A, Blanca A, Cimadamore A, Gogna R, Montironi R, Cheng L. Molecular Classification of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Using NanoString-Based Gene Expression Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(21):5500. Published 2021 Nov 1. doi:10.3390/cancers13215500en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32190
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/cancers13215500en_US
dc.relation.journalCancersen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectBladder canceren_US
dc.subjectMolecular taxonomyen_US
dc.subjectMolecularen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectNanoStringen_US
dc.subjectLuminalen_US
dc.subjectBasalen_US
dc.titleMolecular Classification of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Using NanoString-Based Gene Expression Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cancers-13-05500.pdf
Size:
1.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: