How the distinctive cultures of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools affect the careers, perceptions, and institutional efforts of their anatomy faculties: A qualitative case study of two schools

dc.contributor.authorBrokaw, James J.
dc.contributor.authorByram, Jessica N.
dc.contributor.authorTraser, Courtney J.
dc.contributor.authorArbor, Tafline C.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anatomy & Cell Biology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-22T22:39:37Z
dc.date.available2015-12-22T22:39:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-01
dc.description.abstractAnatomy faculties are integral to basic science instruction in medical schools, particularly given the preponderance of anatomic instruction in the preclinical curriculum. Recent years have witnessed major curricular restructuring and other emerging national trends that pose significant challenges to anatomists. An examination of anatomy faculty perceptions at two philosophically distinct medical schools within this shifting climate provides an indicator of how different institutional characteristics may impact anatomy instruction and other faculty responsibilities. Semistructured interviews of anatomy faculty from a large, well-established allopathic medical school (Indiana University School of Medicine) and a small, new osteopathic medical school (Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine) were explored using qualitative thematic analysis. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) Institutional philosophies, such as affiliation with osteopathic versus allopathic medicine, have minimal impact on how the anatomical sciences are taught. (2) Differences in anatomy faculty experiences at these two institutions are largely driven by the institution's size and history. There is a disparity between institutions in the relative importance of teaching and research, but an ability to do research is important for both faculties. (3) Anatomy instruction and research agendas are driven by personal philosophies and interests rather than institutional philosophy. (4) Autonomy is highly valued by anatomists at both institutions. All the participants share a devotion to educating future physicians. In fact, this study identified more similarities than differences in these two faculties. Finally, we argue that shared educational resources and research collaborations can improve anatomy education and faculty development at both institutions. Anat Sci Educ. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBrokaw, J. J., Byram, J. N., Traser, C. J., & Arbor, T. C. (2015). How the distinctive cultures of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools affect the careers, perceptions, and institutional efforts of their anatomy faculties: A qualitative case study of two schools. Anatomical Sciences Education. [Preprint.] http://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1582en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9780en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7812
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/ase.1582en_US
dc.relation.journalAnatomical Sciences Educationen_US
dc.rightsIUPUI Open Access Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectallopathic medicineen_US
dc.subjectanatomy facultyen_US
dc.subjectfaculty developmenten_US
dc.subjectgross anatomy educationen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional cultureen_US
dc.subjectmedical educationen_US
dc.subjectosteopathic medicineen_US
dc.titleHow the distinctive cultures of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools affect the careers, perceptions, and institutional efforts of their anatomy faculties: A qualitative case study of two schoolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
brokaw-2015-how-the-distinctive.pdf
Size:
156.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Preprint
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: