Bone Microarchitecture and Strength Adaptation to Physical Activity: A Within-Subject Controlled, HRpQCT Study

Abstract

Purpose Physical activity benefits bone mass and cortical bone size. The current study assessed the impact of chronic (≥10 years) physical activity on trabecular microarchitectural properties and micro-finite element (μFE) analyses of estimated bone strength.

Methods Female collegiate-level tennis players (n=15; age=20.3±0.9 yrs) were used as a within-subject controlled model of chronic unilateral upper-extremity physical activity. Racquet-to-nonracquet arm differences at the distal radius and radial diaphysis were assessed using high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HRpQCT). The distal tibia and tibial diaphysis in both legs were also assessed, and cross-country runners (n=15; age=20.8±1.2 yrs) included as controls.

Results The distal radius of the racquet arm had 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9 to 15.7%) greater trabecular bone volume/tissue volume, with trabeculae that were greater in number, thickness, connectivity, and proximity to each other than in the nonracquet arm (all p<0.01). Combined with enhanced cortical bone properties, the microarchitectural advantages at the distal radius contributed a 18.7% (95% CI, 13.0 to 24.4%) racquet-to-nonracquet arm difference in predicted load before failure. At the radial diaphysis, predicted load to failure was 9.6% (95% CI, 6.7 to 12.6%) greater in the racquet vs. nonracquet arm. There were fewer and smaller side-to-side differences at the distal tibia; however, the tibial diaphysis in the leg opposite the racquet arm was larger with a thicker cortex and had 4.4% (95% CI, 1.7 to 7.1%) greater strength than the contralateral leg.

Conclusion Chronically elevated physical activity enhances trabecular microarchitecture and μFE estimated strength, furthering observations from short-term longitudinal studies. The data also demonstrate tennis players exhibit crossed symmetry wherein the leg opposite the racquet arm possesses enhanced tibial properties compared to in the contralateral leg.