Handover Practices in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery: A Multicenter Survey Study

dc.contributor.authorPuzio, Thaddeus J.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Patrick B.
dc.contributor.authorVirtanen, Piiamaria
dc.contributor.authorHarvin, John A.
dc.contributor.authorHartwell, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T16:09:10Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T16:09:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The handover period has been identified as a particularly vulnerable period for communication breakdown leading to patient safety events. Clear and concise handover is especially critical in high-acuity care settings such as trauma, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care. There is no consensus for the most effective and efficient means of evaluating or performing handover in this population. We aimed to characterize the current handover practices and perceptions in trauma and acute care surgery. METHODS: A survey was sent to 2265 members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma via email regarding handoff practices at their institution. Respondents were queried regarding their practice setting, average census, level of trauma center, and patients (trauma, emergency general surgery, and/or intensive care). Data regarding handover practices were gathered including frequency of handover, attendees, duration, timing, and formality. Finally, perceptions of handover including provider satisfaction, desire for improvement, and effectiveness were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty surveys (17.1%) were completed. The majority (73.4%) of respondents practiced at level 1 trauma centers (58.9%) and were trauma/emergency general surgeons (86.5%). Thirty-five percent of respondents reported a formalized handover and 52% used a standardized tool for handover. Only 18% of respondents had ever received formal training, but most (51.6%) thought this training would be helpful. Eighty-one percent of all providers felt handover was essential for patient care, and 77% felt it prevented harm. Seventy-two percent thought their handover practice needed improvement, and this was more common as the average patient census increased. The most common suggestions for improvement were shorter and more concise handover (41.6%), different handover medium (24.5%), and adding verbal communication (13.9%). CONCLUSION: Trauma and emergency general surgeons perceive handover as essential for patient care and the majority desire improvement of their current handover practices. Methods identified to improve the handover process include standardization, simplification, and verbal interaction, which allows for shared understanding. Formal education and best practice guidelines should be developed.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationPuzio, T. J., Murphy, P. B., Virtanen, P., Harvin, J. A., & Hartwell, J. L. (2020). Handover Practices in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery: A Multicenter Survey Study. The Journal of Surgical Research, 254, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8673en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/28454
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.023en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Surgical Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectHandoveren_US
dc.subjectQuality Improvementen_US
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subjectPatient Handoffen_US
dc.titleHandover Practices in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery: A Multicenter Survey Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Puzio2020Handover-AAM.pdf
Size:
520.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: