Plasma and CSF biomarkers in a memory clinic: Head-to-head comparison of phosphorylated tau immunoassays

dc.contributor.authorAshton, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorPuig-Pijoan, Albert
dc.contributor.authorMilà-Alomà, Marta
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Lebrero, Aida
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Escobar, Greta
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Ortiz, Fernándo
dc.contributor.authorKac, Przemysław R.
dc.contributor.authorBrum, Wagner S.
dc.contributor.authorBenedet, Andréa L.
dc.contributor.authorLantero-Rodriguez, Juan
dc.contributor.authorDay, Theresa A.
dc.contributor.authorVanbrabant, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorStoops, Erik
dc.contributor.authorVanmechelen, Eugeen
dc.contributor.authorTriana-Baltzer, Gallen
dc.contributor.authorMoughadam, Setareh
dc.contributor.authorKolb, Hartmuth
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Romero, Paula
dc.contributor.authorKarikari, Thomas K.
dc.contributor.authorMinguillon, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorHernández Sánchez, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorNavalpotro-Gómez, Irene
dc.contributor.authorGrau-Rivera, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorManero, Rosa María
dc.contributor.authorPuente-Periz, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorde la Torre, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorRoquer, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorDage, Jeff L.
dc.contributor.authorZetterberg, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorBlennow, Kaj
dc.contributor.authorSuárez-Calvet, Marc
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-03T07:55:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-03T07:55:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Direct comparisons of the main blood phosphorylated tau immunoassays in memory clinic populations are needed to understand possible differences. Methods: In the BIODEGMAR study, 197 participants presenting with cognitive complaints were classified into an Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a non-AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile group, according to their amyloid beta 42/ phosphorylated tau (Aβ42/p-tau) ratio. We performed a head-to-head comparison of nine plasma and nine CSF tau immunoassays and determined their accuracy to discriminate abnormal CSF Aβ42/p-tau ratio. Results: All studied plasma tau biomarkers were significantly higher in the AD CSF profile group compared to the non-AD CSF profile group and significantly discriminated abnormal CSF Aβ42/p-tau ratio. For plasma p-tau biomarkers, the higher discrimination accuracy was shown by Janssen p-tau217 (r = 0.76; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.96), ADx p-tau181 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94), and Lilly p-tau217 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94). Discussion: Several plasma p-tau biomarkers can be used in a specialized memory clinic as a stand-alone biomarker to detect biologically-defined AD. Highlights: Patients with an Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid (AD CSF) profile have higher plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) levels than the non-AD CSF profile group. All plasma p-tau biomarkers significantly discriminate patients with an AD CSF profile from the non-AD CSF profile group. Janssen p-tau217, ADx p-tau181, and Lilly p-tau217 in plasma show the highest accuracy to detect biologically defined AD. Janssen p-tau217, ADx p-tau181, Lilly p-tau217, Lilly p-tau181, and UGot p-tau231 in plasma show performances that are comparable to their CSF counterparts.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationAshton NJ, Puig-Pijoan A, Milà-Alomà M, et al. Plasma and CSF biomarkers in a memory clinic: Head-to-head comparison of phosphorylated tau immunoassays. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(5):1913-1924. doi:10.1002/alz.12841
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/42588
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/alz.12841
dc.relation.journalAlzheimer's & Dementia
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectBiomarker
dc.subjectDementia
dc.subjectDisease
dc.subjectPhosphorylated tau
dc.subjectPlasma
dc.subjectTau
dc.titlePlasma and CSF biomarkers in a memory clinic: Head-to-head comparison of phosphorylated tau immunoassays
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ashton2023Plasma-AAM.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: