Aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in-office procedures

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2021-02
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wiley
Abstract

Objective Cadaveric simulations have shown endonasal drilling and cautery generate aerosols, which is a significant concern for otolaryngologists during the COVID‐19 era. This study quantifies aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in‐office procedures in live patients.

Methods Aerosols ranging from 0.30 to 10.0 μm were measured in real‐time using an optical particle sizer during surgeries and in‐office procedures. Various mask conditions were tested during rigid nasal endoscopy (RNE) and postoperative debridement (POD).

Results Higher aerosol concentrations (AC) ranging from 2.69 to 10.0 μm were measured during RNE (n = 9) with no mask vs two mask conditions (P = .002 and P = .017). Mean AC (0.30‐10.0 μm) were significantly higher during POD (n = 9) for no mask vs a mask covering the patient's mouth condition (mean difference = 0.16 ± 0.03 particles/cm3, 95% CI 0.10‐0.22, P < .001). There were no discernible spikes in aerosol levels during endoscopic septoplasty (n = 3). Aerosol spikes were measured in two of three functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) with microdebrider. Using suction mitigation, there were no discernible spikes during powered drilling in two anterior skull base surgeries (ASBS).

Conclusion Use of a surgical mask over the patient's mouth during in‐office procedures or a mask with a slit for an endoscope during RNE significantly diminished aerosol generation. However, whether this reduction in aerosol generation is sufficient to prevent transmission of communicable diseases via aerosols was beyond the scope of this study. There were several spikes in aerosols during FESS and ASBS, though none were associated with endonasal drilling with the use of suction mitigation.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Sharma, D., Campiti, V. J., Ye, M. J., Rubel, K. E., Higgins, T. S., Wu, A. W., ... & Ting, J. Y. (2021). Aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in‐office procedures. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 6(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.520
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}