A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorHaas, David M.
dc.contributor.authorDaggy, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorFlannery, Kahtleen M.
dc.contributor.authorDorr, Meredith L.
dc.contributor.authorBonsack, Carrie
dc.contributor.authorBhamidipalli, Surya S.
dc.contributor.authorPierson, Rebecca C.
dc.contributor.authorLathrop, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorTowns, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorHead, Annette
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorQuinney, Sara K.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-01T18:20:19Z
dc.date.available2019-08-01T18:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground Cervical ripening is commonly needed for labor induction. Finding an optimal route of misoprostol dosing for efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction is important and not well studied for the buccal route. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal and buccal misoprostol for women undergoing labor induction at term. Study Design The IMPROVE trial was an institutional review board–approved, triple-masked, placebo-controlled randomized noninferiority trial for women undergoing labor induction at term with a Bishop score ≤6. Enrolled women received 25 mcg (first dose), then 50 mcg (subsequent doses) of misoprostol by assigned route (vaginal or buccal) and a matching placebo tablet by the opposite route. The primary outcomes were time to delivery and the rate of cesarean delivery performed urgently for fetal nonreassurance. A sample size of 300 was planned to test the noninferiority hypothesis. Results The trial enrolled 319 women, with 300 available for analysis, 152 in the vaginal misoprostol group and 148 in the buccal. Groups had similar baseline characteristics. We were unable to demonstrate noninferiority. The time to vaginal delivery was lower for the vaginal misoprostol group (median [95% confidence interval] in hours: vaginal: 20.1 [18.2, 22.8] vs buccal: 28.1 [24.1, 31.4], log-rank test P = .006, Pnoninferiority = .663). The rate of cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status was 3.3% for the vaginal misoprostol group and 9.5% for the buccal misoprostol group (P = .033). The rate of vaginal delivery in <24 hours was higher in the vaginal group (58.6% vs 39.2%, P = .001). Conclusion We were unable to demonstrate noninferiority. In leading to a higher rate of vaginal deliveries, more rapid vaginal delivery, and fewer cesareans for fetal issues, vaginal misoprostol may be superior to buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationHaas, D. M., Daggy, J., Flannery, K. M., Dorr, M. L., Bonsack, C., Bhamidipalli, S. S., … Quinney, S. K. (2019). A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple masked randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20110
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectbuccalen_US
dc.subjectcervical ripeningen_US
dc.subjectlabor inductionen_US
dc.titleA comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Haas_2019_comparison.pdf
Size:
649.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: