Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle: A large multicenter prospective study

dc.contributor.authorAttili, Fabia
dc.contributor.authorFabbri, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorYasuda, Ichiro
dc.contributor.authorFuccio, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorPalazzo, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorTarantino, Ilaria
dc.contributor.authorDewitt, John
dc.contributor.authorFrazzoni, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorRimbaş, Mihai
dc.contributor.authorLarghi, Alberto
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-18T16:29:40Z
dc.date.available2019-04-18T16:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Previous limited experiences have reported the 19-gauge flexible needle to be highly effective in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for transduodenal lesions. We designed a large multicenter prospective study with the aim at evaluating the performance of this newly developed needle. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions who needed to undergo EUS sampling from the duodenum were enrolled in 6 tertiary care referral centers. Puncture of the lesion was performed with the 19-gauge flexible needle (Expect™ and Slimline Expect™ 19 Flex). The feasibility, procurement yield, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: Totally, 246 patients (144 males, mean age 65.1 ± 12.7 years) with solid lesions (203 cases) or enlarged lymph nodes (43 cases) were enrolled, with a mean size of 32.6 ± 12.2 mm. The procedure was technically feasible in 228 patients, with an overall procurement yield of 76.8%. Two centers had suboptimal procurement yields (66.7% and 64.2%). Major complications occurred in six cases: two of bleeding, two of mild acute pancreatitis, one perforation requiring surgery, and one duodenal hematoma. Considering malignant versus nonmalignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.3–76.6), 100% (95% CI: 79.6–100), 35.3 (95% CI: 2.3–549.8)/0.3 (95% CI: 0.2–0.4), and 73.6% (95% CI: 67.6–79). On multivariate analysis, the only determinant of successful EUS-FNB was the center in which the procedure was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of the 19-gauge flexible needle cannot be widely advocated and its implementation should receive local validation after careful evaluation of both the technical success rates and diagnostic yield.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationAttili, F., Fabbri, C., Yasuda, I., Fuccio, L., Palazzo, L., Tarantino, I., … Larghi, A. (2017). Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle: A large multicenter prospective study. Endoscopic Ultrasound, 6(6), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_54_17en_US
dc.identifier.issn2303-9027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/18892
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMedknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/eus.eus_54_17en_US
dc.relation.journalEndoscopic Ultrasounden_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subject19-gauge flexible needleen_US
dc.subjectnitinol endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needleen_US
dc.subjecttransduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisitionen_US
dc.titleLow diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle: A large multicenter prospective studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EndoscUltrasound66402-4486659_122746.pdf
Size:
837.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: