Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU

dc.contributor.authorKhan, Babar A.
dc.contributor.authorFadel, William F.
dc.contributor.authorTricker, Jason L.
dc.contributor.authorCarlos, W. Graham
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Mark O.
dc.contributor.authorHui, Siu L.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Noll L.
dc.contributor.authorEly, E. Wesley
dc.contributor.authorBoustani, Malaz A.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-22T17:49:53Z
dc.date.available2016-11-22T17:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receive significant amounts of sedatives and analgesics that increase their risk of developing coma and delirium. We evaluated the impact of a "Wake-up and Breathe Protocol" at our local ICU on sedation and delirium. DESIGN: A pre/post implementation study design. SETTING: A 22-bed mixed surgical and medical ICU. PATIENTS: Seven hundred two consecutive mechanically ventilated ICU patients from June 2010 to January 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of daily paired spontaneous awakening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement project. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After implementation of our program, there was an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekdays of 0.88 (p < 0.0001) and an increase in the mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores on weekends of 1.21 (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, primary diagnosis, and ICU, the incidence and prevalence of delirium did not change post implementation of the protocol (incidence: 23% pre vs 19.6% post; p = 0.40; prevalence: 66.7% pre vs 55.3% post; p = 0.06). The combined prevalence of delirium/coma decreased from 90.8% pre protocol implementation to 85% postimplementation (odds ratio, 0.505; 95% CI, 0.299-0.853; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a "Wake Up and Breathe Program" resulted in reduced sedation among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients but did not change the incidence or prevalence of delirium.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationKhan, B. A., Fadel, W. F., Tricker, J. L., Carlos, W. G., Farber, M. O., Hui, S. L., … Boustani, M. A. (2014). Effectiveness of Implementing a Wake up and Breathe Program on Sedation and Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Medicine, 42(12), e791–e795. http://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-0293en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11488
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer) - Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/CCM.0000000000000660en_US
dc.relation.journalCritical Care Medicineen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCritical Illnessen_US
dc.subjectDeep Sedationen_US
dc.subjectmethodsen_US
dc.subjectDeliriumen_US
dc.subjectprevention & controlen_US
dc.subjectRespirationen_US
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificialen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of implementing a wake up and breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICUen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms655309.pdf
Size:
124.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: