The SPADE Symptom Cluster in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Lorie L.
dc.contributor.authorKroenke, Kurt
dc.contributor.authorMonahan, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorKean, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorStump, Timothy E.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T16:34:04Z
dc.date.available2018-03-13T16:34:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue, the SPADE pentad, are the most prevalent and co-occurring symptoms in the general population and clinical practice. Co-occurrence of SPADE symptoms may produce additive impairment and negatively affect treatment response, potentially undermining patients' health and functioning. The purpose of this paper is to determine: (1) prevalence and comorbidity (ie, clustering) of SPADE symptoms; (2) internal reliability and construct validity of a composite SPADE symptom score derived from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures; and (3) whether improvement in somatic symptom burden represented by a composite score predicted subsequent measures of functional status at 3 and 12 months follow-up. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the Stepped Care to Optimize Pain care Effectiveness study, a randomized trial of a collaborative care intervention for Veterans with chronic pain. RESULTS: Most patients had multiple SPADE symptoms; only 9.6% of patients were monosymptomatic. The composite PROMIS symptom score had good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.86) and construct validity and strongly correlated with multiple measures of functional status; improvement in the composite score significantly correlated with higher scores for 5 of 6 functional status outcomes. The standardized error of measurement (SEM) for the composite T-score was 2.84, suggesting a 3-point difference in an individual's composite score may be clinically meaningful. DISCUSSION: Brief PROMIS measures may be useful in evaluating SPADE symptoms and overall symptom burden. Because symptom burden may predict functional status outcomes, better identification and management of comorbid symptoms may be warranted.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, L. L., Kroenke, K., Monahan, P., Kean, J., & Stump, T. E. (2016). The SPADE Symptom Cluster in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 32(5), 388–393. http://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000286en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15459
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/AJP.0000000000000286en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Clinical Journal of Painen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectChronic painen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectSleepen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.titleThe SPADE Symptom Cluster in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms712228.pdf
Size:
125.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: