The global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods

dc.contributor.authorPannee, Josef
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Leslie M.
dc.contributor.authorKorecka, Magdalena
dc.contributor.authorWaligorska, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorTeunissen, Charlotte E.
dc.contributor.authorStoops, Erik
dc.contributor.authorVanderstichele, Hugo M. J.
dc.contributor.authorMauroo, Kimberley
dc.contributor.authorVerberk, Inge M. W.
dc.contributor.authorKeshavan, Ashvini
dc.contributor.authorPesini, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorSarasa, Leticia
dc.contributor.authorPascual-Lucas, Maria
dc.contributor.authorFandos, Noelia
dc.contributor.authorAllué, José-Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPortelius, Erik
dc.contributor.authorAndreasson, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorYoda, Ritsuko
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Akinori
dc.contributor.authorKaneko, Naoki
dc.contributor.authorYang, Shieh-Yueh
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Huei-Chun
dc.contributor.authorPalme, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorBittner, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMawuenyega, Kwasi G.
dc.contributor.authorOvod, Vitaliy
dc.contributor.authorBollinger, James
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Randall J.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yan
dc.contributor.authorDage, Jeffrey L.
dc.contributor.authorStomrud, Erik
dc.contributor.authorHansson, Oskar
dc.contributor.authorSchott, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.authorBlennow, Kaj
dc.contributor.authorZetterberg, Henrik
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T14:25:04Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T14:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-14
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Blood-based assays to measure brain amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition are an attractive alternative to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based assays currently used in clinical settings. In this study, we examined different blood-based assays to measure Aβ and how they compare among centers and assays. Methods: Aliquots from 81 plasma samples were distributed to 10 participating centers. Seven immunological assays and four mass-spectrometric methods were used to measure plasma Aβ concentrations. Results: Correlations were weak for Aβ42 while Aβ40 correlations were stronger. The ratio Aβ42/Aβ40 did not improve the correlations and showed weak correlations. Discussion: The poor correlations for Aβ42 in plasma might have several potential explanations, such as the high levels of plasma proteins (compared to CSF), sensitivity to pre-analytical sample handling and specificity, and cross-reactivity of different antibodies. Different methods might also measure different pools of plasma Aβ42. We, however, hypothesize that greater correlations might be seen in future studies because many of the methods have been refined during completion of this study.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationPannee J, Shaw LM, Korecka M, et al. The global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13(1):e12242. Published 2021 Oct 14. doi:10.1002/dad2.12242
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43272
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/dad2.12242
dc.relation.journalAlzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectAlzheimer's disease
dc.subjectAmyloid beta
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectMethod comparison
dc.subjectPlasma
dc.titleThe global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pannee2021Global-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
738.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: