Comparison of Risk Factor Control in the Year After Discharge for Ischemic Stroke Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction

dc.contributor.authorBravata, Dawn M.
dc.contributor.authorDaggy, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorBrosch, Jared
dc.contributor.authorSico, Jason J.
dc.contributor.authorBaye, Fitsum
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Laura J.
dc.contributor.authorRoumie, Christianne L.
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Eric
dc.contributor.authorCoffing, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorArling, Greg
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T20:13:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T20:13:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Veterans Health Administration has engaged in quality improvement to improve vascular risk factor control. We sought to examine blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg), lipid (LDL [low-density lipoprotein] cholesterol <100 mg/dL), and glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c <9%), in the year post-hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We identified patients who were hospitalized (fiscal year 2011) with ischemic stroke, AMI, congestive heart failure, transient ischemic attack, or pneumonia/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The primary analysis compared risk factor control after incident ischemic stroke versus AMI. Facilities were included if they cared for ≥25 ischemic stroke and ≥25 AMI patients. A generalized linear mixed model including patient- and facility-level covariates compared risk factor control across diagnoses. RESULTS: Forty thousand two hundred thirty patients were hospitalized (n=75 facilities): 2127 with incident ischemic stroke and 4169 with incident AMI. Fewer stroke patients achieved blood pressure control than AMI patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.67 versus 77%; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.78; P<0.0001). After adjusting for patient and facility covariates, the odds of blood pressure control were still higher for AMI than ischemic stroke patients (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.51). There were no statistical differences for AMI versus stroke patients in hyperlipidemia (P=0.534). Among patients with diabetes mellitus, the odds of glycemic control were lower for AMI than ischemic stroke patients (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Given that hypertension control is a cornerstone of stroke prevention, interventions to improve poststroke hypertension management are neededen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationBravata, D. M., Daggy, J., Brosch, J., Sico, J. J., Baye, F., Myers, L. J., … Arling, G. (2018). Comparison of Risk Factor Control in the Year After Discharge for Ischemic Stroke Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction. Stroke. Retrieved from https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017142en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2917en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/17521
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Heart Associationen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jmt/thy001en_US
dc.relation.journalStrokeen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen_US
dc.subjecthyperlipidemiaen_US
dc.subjecthypertensionen_US
dc.subjectmyocardial infarctionen_US
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Risk Factor Control in the Year After Discharge for Ischemic Stroke Versus Acute Myocardial Infarctionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
STROKEAHA.117.017142.pdf
Size:
214.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: