Surgical and Trauma Capacity Assessment in Rural Haryana, India

dc.contributor.authorBhatia, Manisha B.
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Srivarshini C.
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Kevin J.
dc.contributor.authorBoeck, Marissa A.
dc.contributor.authorBhalla, Ashish
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Sristi
dc.contributor.authorHelenowski, Irene
dc.contributor.authorTatebe, Leah C.
dc.contributor.authorNwomeh, Benedict C.
dc.contributor.authorSwaroop, Mamta
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-16T18:58:18Z
dc.date.available2022-05-16T18:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-12
dc.description.abstractBackground: Trauma is a major global health problem and majority of the deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at even higher rates in the rural areas. The three-delay model assesses three different delays in accessing healthcare and can be applied to improve surgical and trauma healthcare delivery. Prior to implementing change, the capacities of the rural India healthcare system need to be identified. Objective: The object of this study was to estimate surgical and trauma care capacities of government health facilities in rural Nanakpur, Haryana, India using the Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment and Supplies (PIPES) and International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma (INTACT) tools. Methods: The PIPES and INTACT tools were administered at eight government health facilities serving the population of Nanakpur in June 2015. Data analysis was performed per tool subsection, and an overall score was calculated. Higher PIPES or INTACT indices correspond to greater surgical or trauma care capacity, respectively. Findings: Surgical and trauma care capacities increased with higher levels of care. The median PIPES score was significantly higher for tertiary facilities than primary and secondary facilities [13.8 (IQR 9.5, 18.2) vs. 4.7 (IQR 3.9, 6.2), p = 0.03]. The lower-level facilities were mainly lacking in personnel and procedures. Conclusions: Surgical and trauma care capacities at healthcare facilities in Haryana, India demonstrate a shortage of surgical resources at lower-level centers. Specifically, the Primary Health Centers were not operating at full capacity. These results can inform resource allocation, including increasing education, across different facility levels in rural India.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationBhatia MB, Mohan SC, Blair KJ, et al. Surgical and Trauma Capacity Assessment in Rural Haryana, India. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):15. Published 2021 Feb 12. doi:10.5334/aogh.3173en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29031
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5334/aogh.3173en_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Global Healthen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectDelivery of health careen_US
dc.subjectEmergency medical servicesen_US
dc.subjectGlobal healthen_US
dc.subjectTrauma centersen_US
dc.titleSurgical and Trauma Capacity Assessment in Rural Haryana, Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
agh-87-1-3173.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: