Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Aries Bordetella Assay

dc.contributor.authorRelich, Ryan F.
dc.contributor.authorLeber, Amy
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSchutzbank, Ted
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorFarhang, Janet
dc.contributor.authorUphoff, Timothy S.
dc.contributor.departmentPathology & Laboratory Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-06T14:30:40Z
dc.date.available2019-09-06T14:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-30
dc.description.abstractMolecular methods offer superior sensitivity and specificity and reduce testing turnaround time from days to hours for detection of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis In this study, we evaluated the performance of the automated PCR-based Aries Bordetella Assay, which detects both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis directly from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The limits of detection (LoDs) were 1,800 CFU·ml-1 for B. pertussis and 213 CFU·ml-1 for B. parapertussis The assay detected 16/18 unique B. pertussis/B. parapertussis strains. Of 71 potentially cross-reacting organisms, 5 generated false positives in 1/6 replicates; none of 6 additional Bordetella spp. were erroneously detected. Specimens were stable at 20 to 25°C for at least 10 h, at 4 to 8°C for 10 days, and at temperatures not exceeding -70°C for 6 months. Of 1,052 nasopharyngeal specimens from patients with suspected pertussis, 3.0% (n = 32) were B. pertussis positive and 0.2% (n = 2) were B. parapertussis positive. Combining these data with Aries Bordetella Assay data from 57 nasopharyngeal samples with previously confirmed B. pertussis or B. parapertussis data and with data from 50 contrived B. parapertussis samples, the proportions of positive and negative agreement of the respective Aries assays with the reference assays were 97.1% and 99.0% for B. pertussis and 100% and 99.7% for B. parapertussis The Aries Bordetella Assay provides accurate detection and distinction of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis infections within 2 h. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02862262.).en_US
dc.identifier.citationRelich, R. F., Leber, A., Young, S., Schutzbank, T., Dunn, R., Farhang, J., & Uphoff, T. S. (2019). Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Aries Bordetella Assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01471-18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20834
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1128/JCM.01471-18en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectBordetella parapertussisen_US
dc.subjectBordetella pertussisen_US
dc.subjectPCRen_US
dc.subjectPertussisen_US
dc.subjectWhooping coughen_US
dc.titleMulticenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Aries Bordetella Assayen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Journal of Clinical Microbiology-2018-Relich-JCM.01471-18.full.pdf
Size:
822.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Manuscript
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
JCM.01471-18.pdf
Size:
243.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: