Quadruple Screening in the Age of Cell-Free DNA: What are We Losing?
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Alison | |
dc.contributor.author | Shanks, Anthony L. | |
dc.contributor.department | Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-09T19:20:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-09T19:20:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Cell-free DNA has emerged as the most reliable, non-invasive prenatal screening tool for fetal aneuploidies. It has come to replace the previously widely used quadruple screen offered in the second trimester of pregnancy. This change comes with improved detection for aneuploidy but also presents potential gaps in prenatal diagnosis including detection of open fetal defects and emerging data on prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review article provides a historical summary of the quadruple marker screen and evaluates the intersection of this screen with cell-free DNA. Furthermore, it discusses points to consider as providers trend toward cell-free DNA testing alone and reviews potential options to remedy any disparities. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Schmidt, A., & Shanks, A. (2021). Quadruple Screening in the Age of Cell-Free DNA: What are We Losing? OBM Genetics, 5(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.genet.2103138 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/31195 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lidsen | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.21926/obm.genet.2103138 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | OBM Genetics | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | * |
dc.source | Publisher | en_US |
dc.subject | quadruple screen | en_US |
dc.subject | non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) | en_US |
dc.subject | cell-free DNA | en_US |
dc.title | Quadruple Screening in the Age of Cell-Free DNA: What are We Losing? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |