Promoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults: a pilot RCT comparing 3-Step Workout for Life versus resistance exercise

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Chiung-Ju
dc.contributor.authorXu, Huiping
dc.contributor.authorKeith, NiCole R.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Daniel O.
dc.contributor.departmentOccupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-20T20:39:00Z
dc.date.available2017-12-20T20:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Resistance exercise is effective to increase muscle strength for older adults; however, its effect on the outcome of activities of daily living is often limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 3-Step Workout for Life (which combines resistance exercise, functional exercise, and activities of daily living exercise) would be more beneficial than resistance exercise alone. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two inactive, community-dwelling older adults (mean age =73 years) with muscle weakness and difficulty in activities of daily living were randomized to receive 3-Step Workout for Life or resistance exercise only. Participants in the 3-Step Workout for Life Group performed functional movements and selected activities of daily living at home in addition to resistance exercise. Participants in the Resistance Exercise Only Group performed resistance exercise only. Both groups were comparable in exercise intensity (moderate), duration (50-60 minutes each time for 10 weeks), and frequency (three times a week). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a standard performance test on activities of daily living, was administered at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months after intervention completion. RESULTS: At postintervention, the 3-Step Workout for Life Group showed improvement on the outcome measure (mean change from baseline =0.29, P=0.02), but the improvement was not greater than the Resistance Exercise Only Group (group mean difference =0.24, P=0.13). However, the Resistance Exercise Only Group showed a significant decline (mean change from baseline =-0.25, P=0.01) 6 months after the intervention completion. Meanwhile, the superior effect of 3-Step Workout for Life was observed (group mean difference =0.37, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared to resistance exercise alone, 3-Step Workout for Life improves the performance of activities of daily living and attenuates the disablement process in older adults.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLiu, C.-J., Xu, H., Keith, N. R., & Clark, D. O. (2017). Promoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults: a pilot RCT comparing 3-Step Workout for Life versus resistance exercise. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 12, 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S136678en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/14852
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDoveen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2147/CIA.S136678en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Interventions in Agingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectactivities of daily livingen_US
dc.subjectaging in placeen_US
dc.subjectdisablement processen_US
dc.subjectfunctional exerciseen_US
dc.subjectresistance exerciseen_US
dc.titlePromoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults: a pilot RCT comparing 3-Step Workout for Life versus resistance exerciseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CIA-136678-promoting-adl-independence-in-vulnerable--community-dwelling_071917.pdf
Size:
675.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: