Outflow Facility Effects of 3 Schlemm’s Canal Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Devices

dc.contributor.authorToris, Carol B.
dc.contributor.authorPattabiraman, Padmanabhan P.
dc.contributor.authorTye, George
dc.contributor.authorSamuelson, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.authorRhee, Douglas J.
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T21:49:27Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T21:49:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractPurpose To study the effect of 3 Schlemm’s canal (SC) microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices on outflow facility. Design Paired comparisons, randomized design, baseline-controlled study. Participants Thirty-six pairs of dissected anterior segments from donated human eye bank eyes without glaucoma were studied. A baseline measurement was collected from each eye to serve as its control. Methods Using a constant pressure perfusion method, outflow facility was measured in paired eyes from human donors. Measurements were made at perfusion pressures of 10 mmHg, 20 mmHg, 30 mmHg, and 40 mmHg. Outflow facility was measured before (baseline control) and after the implantation of an SC glaucoma drainage device or sham procedure. Three sets of experiments were carried out comparing 1 and 2 iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents and 2 iStent Inject implants with the Hydrus Microstent. Main Outcome Measures Change in outflow facility from baseline or contralateral eye. Results After Hydrus placement, the outflow facility increased from 0.23±0.03 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury at baseline to 0.38±0.03 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury (P < 0.001). The percent increase in outflow facility was 79±21% for the Hydrus and 11±16% for the 2 iStent Inject devices, a difference that was significant (P = 0.018). Outflow facility with 1 iStent (0.38±0.07 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury) was greater than baseline (0.28±0.03 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury; P = 0.031). The 1 iStent showed a greater increase in outflow facility from baseline (0.10±0.04 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury) compared with the sham procedure (–0.08±0.05 μl/minute per millimeter of mercury; P = 0.042). No other significant differences were found. Conclusions The longer the MIGS device, and thus the more SC that it dilates, the greater the outflow facility.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationToris, C. B., Pattabiraman, P. P., Tye, G., Samuelson, T. W., & Rhee, D. J. (2020). Outflow Facility Effects of 3 Schlemm’s Canal Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Devices. Ophthalmology. Glaucoma, 3(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2019.11.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/25258
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ogla.2019.11.013en_US
dc.relation.journalGlaucomaen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectSchlemm’s canalen_US
dc.subjectmicroinvasive glaucoma surgeryen_US
dc.subjectMIGS devicesen_US
dc.titleOutflow Facility Effects of 3 Schlemm’s Canal Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Devicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Toris2020Outflow.pdf
Size:
865.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: