Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial

dc.contributor.authorSatava, Richard M.
dc.contributor.authorStefanidis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Roger
dc.contributor.authorMartin, John R.
dc.contributor.authorMonfared, Sara
dc.contributor.authorTimsina, Lava R.
dc.contributor.authorWardkes Darzi, Ara
dc.contributor.authorMoglia, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorBrand, Timothy C.
dc.contributor.authorDorin, Ryan P.
dc.contributor.authorDumon, Kristoffel R.
dc.contributor.authorFrancone, Todd D.
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiou, Evangelos
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Alvin C.
dc.contributor.authorMarcet, Jorge E.
dc.contributor.authorMartino, Martin A.
dc.contributor.authorSudan, Ranjan
dc.contributor.authorVale, Justin
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Anthony G.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T22:10:46Z
dc.date.available2020-10-30T22:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.description.abstractObjective: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. Summary Background Data: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. Methods: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. Results: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82–0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40–0.67). Conclusions: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSatava, R. M., Stefanidis, D., Levy, J. S., Smith, R., Martin, J. R., Monfared, S., Timsina, L. R., Darzi, A. W., Moglia, A., Brand, T. C., Dorin, R. P., Dumon, K. R., Francone, T. D., Georgiou, E., Goh, A. C., Marcet, J. E., Martino, M. A., Sudan, R., Vale, J., & Gallagher, A. G. (2020). Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial. Annals of Surgery, 272(2), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24239
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincotten_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220en_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectfundamentals of robotic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectcurriculumen_US
dc.subjectrobotic surgery skillsen_US
dc.titleProving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Satava_2020_proving.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: